eazybee, you make a sensible and sensitive post. The OP hasn't returned, little wonder given many of the responses.
Do you think you know when you are going to die?
New to this site, in turmoil not being able to see my granddaughter, dad has custody after my granddaughter was removed from my daughter’s care 3 yrs ago (very distressing time) I have a good bond with my granddaughter so it was an awful time, she lives 2 hrs away with dad. We went to court for access because he made it very difficult for us to have contact with her, we now have a court order in place for weekend visits every month and a FaceTime every week which we never get, because of C19 he’s used this to his advantage to make contact impossible, FaceTime/ calls are promised but never materialise. Does anyone have any advice or should we go back to court? Thanks
eazybee, you make a sensible and sensitive post. The OP hasn't returned, little wonder given many of the responses.
Children are much better off with adults on the same team, not fighting over them. Have you considered the route of building a genuine relationship with the father and earning his trust? I would start by apologizing to him for ever bringing this to court.
The grandparent was awarded visitation and face time-
Understandably, visitation isn't wise at this time- Face time on the other hand is safe-
The child is at least 3, according to the OP- Old enough at the very least to say hello via video chat- The father could also be cooperative and text a video or photos and encourage the relationship that's been deemed meaningful by the court, in the child's best interest-
The OP should document all of her efforts and petition the court again if the father refuses to adhere to the ruling-
The fact that the GPs went to court for GPR means that they had issues with the father of the child allowing visits before the GPR were awarded?
There is more to this story than just the parent allegedly disrupting the visitation schedule.
The court forcing a visitation schedule does not mean that the differences and conflicts with the parent automatically disappear.
The fact that they had to go to court in order to secure the right to maintain a relationship with their grandchild speaks volumes about the fathers reluctance/refusal to cooperate-
One doesn't petition the court without proof of prior effort+ They petition the court after their efforts have been dashed-
Hithere, the Court order doesn't mean the differences disappear, of course. What it does do, is recognise a significant relationship already exists and its in the child's best interests for that relationship to continue
You must be very worried. We may be in difficult times but we are at home far more than usual so I don’t see why FaceTime should not take place as agreed by the court.
I think if it were me I would email him if you can, and explain how you feel but if the problem continues then you could contact the solicitor involved at the time court made its decision. As Iam says, it clearly felt continued contact with you was important fir your grandchild. Good luck.
Don’t forget to keep a written record of all contacts and conversations.
Iam64.
Exactly. That where the problem may come from.
Thankful for so many responses to my op, I did deactivate the account but decided to return and explain a bit further.
My GD is 6 and we have a very close relationship. Going to court was the very last resort for us to enable that relationship because dad made it impossible for us to have any access, the court decided for her well being that she should have regular contact with us and that was awarded however dad has often dug his heels In and still makes it difficult for us, this is all about control for him, we have tried every way possible to engage and support him emotionally and financially. I understand she may not want to come to the phone and I understand this isn’t about us or him but I just want to ensure she has access to us which dad revels in denying and is using this lockdown to his advantage, obviously visits cannot happen at the moment but calls or FaceTime can. We will not give up on her.
He doesn't owe you contact in exchange for your kindness.
Well he may not owe , but basic decency and care for his daughter says he would allow it, as (from the information given and with NO alternative conjecture because I don't know) the granddaughter appears happy with the "good relationship with her grandparents!!"
IF he feels that the relationship is not a positive or beneficial one, that's up to him but IF that is the case, at the moment if he takes the kindness he is having his cake and eating it. If he does feel that then he should break off contact, (and deal with the court order consequences) not take the kindness whilst making it inconsistent for his daughter!!
NTMB
What are the issues why the father didn't want you to see his dd?
The father may have felt you forced his hand and even if the judge thinks it is beneficial for the kid, he still disagrees.
I am not saying who is right and who is wrong here.
Are calls getting picked up and nobody talks or just they/you are not calling at all?
Days and times are given for the calls but they never materialise I then follow up and another day and time is offered this doesn’t happen either, it’s game playing & carrot dangling.
Can you not call them at the time? That way you then have the call log as well and they can’t throw waiting for you to call them at you.
This kind of situation is tough. ntmbl, was there a children's guardian involved ? If so, it may be worth a call to talk through the best way forward
Hithere, I recognise your point but the child should be the most important thing here
I think right now because everyone one is handling this stressful situation with the pandemic in their own way to realize that no one is reacting to stress of any kind well. When the time is right you can peruse. But if the child is the one not wanting to have contact, as hard as it is, honor that. The pandemic is causing everyone to grieve in their own way. Children are affected as well.
If dad is not honouring the FaceTime he could say why.
And the child doesn’t have to be plonked in front of the camera to perform as suggested by a pp. the child could be at a table colouring in and grandparents could have a short chat about what child is drawing.... just an example.
Dad is in breach of the court order regarding FaceTime. He is in contempt of court.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.