lulus3
spabbygirl
I was a child protection social worker in Gloucestershire and we had excellent and very busy foster carers age 83, they did really well and were still active after I left 2yrs later. The age of the children really helps, no night time feeds etc, & you can buy in outside help like cleaning if you find you get physically tired. I was an older mum/foster carer & found what you loose in physical care you gain in emotional care, young people love chats about emotional issues & you'll have experience to do that more so than many younger people.
In england you apply to the court for a special guardianship order and they send a social worker to speak to all parties & produce a report for the family court. The court also won't want to separate the children, who presumably will want too stay with you. The eldest is almost of age anyway. I've written many of these reports. The court will award an SGO to you if they agree that is best (sounds like that is the case) and that gives you greater parental responsibility as well as the natural parents, they don't loose PR. Courts are well used to dealing with unhelpful ex's. SGO's are super arrangement.
You can see the format the social worker has to use (its not a form but format) if you google special guardianship assessment, and there is a good website called sgoinfo.co.uk
Many grandparents feel like you & worry about not getting it but their worries are usually unfounded, it's the chaotic, problematic families whose children may need to be cared for by someone else, ie. foster care. So sorry about your daughter
thank you, that's really helpful to hear! We have a similar thing here in Scotland, just a bit scary to read some stories re SGO's, even read of one where social workers put the children in care while they did all the reports etc, which would be so wrong. Every case is so different of course. We do think there are enough things to be said against their father having them, not least having no accommodation for them! May I private message you with some info, would be interested to get your professional views? It's a very upsetting time here, but working out various plans is kind of looking to the future and hoping it all works out. thanks
Hi Lulu, glad you found that helpful and yes, do message me, the bar for a local authority to take a child into care is really high, often there are young people I'd have liked to take into care but can't because the grounds are insufficient, there are many children in what I see as a grey area who stay with their natural parents. Those that are in care whilst the report is being written are those whose proposed new parents have doubt about them, perhaps they might allow a violent parent into their home, maybe they are happy for people whose commitment to keeping children safe is questionable and they might allow people to take the children out against the local authority's instructions, maybe there are queries about their own drug or alcohol use or unwanted sexual activities. Those young people won't be not allowed to stay with their new families for no good reason, it has to be a good reason with proof. The LA has to prove that putting the children in care is better for them than being with family. It also has to prove that it has a better alternative and finding places for 4 without separating them is very difficult. From what you said there just isn't evidence to remove them and no LA would want to cause disruption to the children by taking them away from family without good reason. It is CAFCAS, the children and family court advisory service who would supply the social worker to write the report, the exception being if a family have had contact with the local authority in which case they might supply the social worker, as they'd have easier access to those records. Does the father want to care for them or is he happy for you to with lots of contact? It does help if he agrees and contact is agreed, however difficult that can be with some people's past behaviour. It does feel very uncertain for grandparents in this position.