Thinking about the Huffington Post article:
//Studies have found that anywhere from one-third to three-quarters of people classified as obese are metabolically healthy. They show no signs of elevated blood pressure, insulin resistance or high cholesterol. Meanwhile, about a quarter of non-overweight people are what epidemiologists call “the lean unhealthy [presumably metabolically unhealthy, i.e. they do show elevated blood pressure, insulin resistance or high cholesterol].”//
So whereas 33%-75% of obese people are metabolically unhealthy, only 25% of non-overweight people are. That’s a difference right there. Obese people are more likely to get diabetes.
That’s without looking at other aspects of health such as cancers, arthritis and, as the article says, heart problems.
//Individuals are not averages.// True. Because individuals vary, some bodies can cope with being obese better than others. But comparing one group of people with another, such as obese people with non-overweight people, can show that not being overweight reduces an individual’s probability of having various health problems. I’m not sure this journalist quite gets that.
If someone does their best to stay at a healthy weight, they are increasing their chances of good health. Of course it doesn’t always lead to good health, because other factors are involved (like nutrition, genetic predisposition to certain health problems, sleep, stress, substance abuse, social isolation, etc). That doesn’t mean it isn’t worth doing. I wouldn’t like to find out if my body is one of those that will handle obesity without health consequences, in case it’s not.
//diets don’t work/
But even if they don’t, changing what you eat does.
Could someone tell me what happened to the post ...
well done