Its looks like "soft play" from here, HVDY. Chilly, rain on the way? did you get enough sleep with Jaffa still in "Welcoming home" mode?
DS didnt stay long - he woke me up to say goodbye earlier than I thought. Was to be 10 15.
Came and gave a hug.
Then downstairs I found he had messed up putting the TV on, couldn't work the stove to heat up the croissants, and had clearly given up, 🤣
But wanted to get back home asap (DiL had been away 3 days before he had to set out for the conference, so all understood. Needed and is needed for family life.
It was lovely just having time in his company after the Zoom.
Anyway my brain like mush as expected as yesterday full on before the Zoom.
The Zoom.
Just speed read or walk on by as its long but each bit significant in terms of outcomes.
" I am satisfied that they heard me. That as things stand, I cannot bear to be in our worship room with my assailant.
But no conclusions about him being allowed back - to be discussed. Fair enough, really, except more uncertainty. Middle next week.
Also, although they were not free to disclose who, they talked about "other women coming forward" - it is likely, not certain, it was as regards MrA. But indeed, if it involves other men, it has woken Safeguarding up.
More has been discussed than I realised amongst pastoral care people.
Including something I need -*some kind of respite, some being looked after*. (it would have been good if I had known this, but then, they don't know me - which is that I prefer "full information” not behind my back, but then, in an ever changing situation ...well, I do trust them more now as never before)
They have however, broadly speaking, a duty of care towards MrA too.
My personal feelings and assessment on that is that he will not have to self examine unless what he wants - to come back to our little meeting full time
- is withheld from him.
(Then that makes me feel guilty, and did on waking today - but then, I'm inclined to that way and a bit of " I must have done something wrong")
But I refused to say what the outcome I wanted was. Because if a decision is made which affects MrA substantially, I do not want to be the one carrying the can
They understand I need to get on with my life without the prospect of continuing being reminded of the assault.
I was able to detail the real effects on me, which I haven’t fully previously.
I had had to marginally criticise Safeguarding and the lead local person there, had an edge to her voice at the beginning, which it did not have at the end.
I described it like being assaulted by a trusted older man within a family, for us Quakers are a kind of family - given that it's been part of my life for nearly 40 years.
I didn't offer them the option that I had discussed with my sister last night - that he be allowed to continue coming back one week's meeting per month.
It was a compromise I'd only thought of so I wouldn't be criticised for being unreasonable:
and I am now uncertain whether I should have said it or not, but I was being true to myself.
I still feel a responsibility, but then, in a way, we are all responsible for family or close groups we belong to.
Hanging around and not doing is the order of the day.
I have Friday to look forward to as my first "get along with well/father of DS" Ex comes over once a month for other purposes so it being a sunny day maybe a walk.
Ellie Anne how are you?
Butterflies, I've never seen this one before
Disappearing contributors - part 2


...
. Grief is so awful. I know my brother misses his wife and son terribly. There's nothing anyone can do to help anyone who has been bereaved, except listen and sympathise.
.