Gransnet forums

News & politics

PMQ

(95 Posts)
Devorgilla Wed 16-Sept-15 13:02:18

Well, I have to say that I was impressed. JC managed the whole affair quite well and it was a refreshing approach. It will be interesting to see if this style can be maintained. One tweet on it stated that it was quite smart in that it is harder for the PM to dismiss questions sent in by the public.
On the other hand JC did not challenge DC's responses. Think he will need to be prepared to do that at some stage.
Currently suffering from deprivation of the weekly 'blood-letting'. GO looked decidedly miffed he hadn't got his weekly fix of braying at the Opposition.

Luckygirl Wed 16-Sept-15 21:48:59

Grannyknot - the point is not whether people watch it on TV (and I am sure that most do indeed switch off) but the fact that it is on TV and more people now know what a pig's ear it all is with the set piece attacks and braying supporters - totally unedifying and I for one resent it. They are there to represent us, not to play public school boy games. If JC can make soem inroads into that then I will be very happy about it.

Luckygirl Wed 16-Sept-15 21:51:03

The idea that they are trying to make one or the other "crack" is part of the problem. We want them to disagree, because that is the point of political opposition, but I would like to see this done in a rational way, rather than this playgroup squabble scenario.

Notso Wed 16-Sept-15 21:57:30

Asking questions submitted by constituents was fine, but at no point did JC come back at DC about any of his replies.

So an easy ride for the PM and a bit of a cop-out from JC.

rosesarered Wed 16-Sept-15 22:03:15

well, we all like different things and PMQ's are no different, some like a quiet, mannerly approach, some like a bit of verbal cut and thrust, some like a few fireworks, and some would be happy to see MP's throwing a few actual punches and knocking each other senseless on the dispatch box.
wink

Ana Wed 16-Sept-15 22:04:07

I didn't say or mean that either one of them was going to try to make the other crack, Luckygirl.

It's just one of those things that will inevitably happen.

NotTooOld Wed 16-Sept-15 22:09:42

roses - I love your idea of PMQ, throwing a few punches, knocking each other senseless, what a great idea. Only trouble is, JC says he is a pacifist so he wouldn't be able to join in. Perhaps he could be the referee? Politics is turning into fun, isn't it? But then there is ISIS knocking at the door..........

durhamjen Wed 16-Sept-15 22:14:49

Yesterday, there was a debate in Westminster Hall about a vote of no confidence in Jeremy Hunt.
The debate was a travesty.
That was not the question debated, and the conclusion was that they had debated the question.

Anyone who can suggest questions to Corbyn could ask him to ask Cameron about that.

Ana Wed 16-Sept-15 22:16:18

Which isn't very likely to happen, since there are far more important issues at stake.

NotTooOld Wed 16-Sept-15 22:23:37

Ana - you must surely think the NHS is important?

durhamjen Wed 16-Sept-15 22:29:13

She probably has private healthcare.

Ana Wed 16-Sept-15 22:30:25

Of course I do, but quibbling about the result of a debate which has already happened is not what PMQs is supposed to be for.

Ana Wed 16-Sept-15 22:33:54

dj you must be joking! I think you are probably much better off than I am. I have no private pension, and unfortunately my late husband did not have life insurance so I'm still paying off our mortgage.

Please don't make assumptions about other people in such a mean way.

NotTooOld Wed 16-Sept-15 22:41:07

'.....quibbling about the result of a debate which has already happened is not what PMQs is supposed to be for.....'

Ah - point taken, Ana. I misunderstood your comment. Sorry.

Ana Wed 16-Sept-15 22:41:41

Oh - and no, I don't have private health care. Can't afford it! hmm

durhamjen Wed 16-Sept-15 22:43:09

Westminster Hall

14 Sep 2015 : Column 185WH
Westminster Hall
Monday 14 September 2015
[Valerie Vaz in the Chair]
NHS (Contracts and Conditions)
4.31 pm

Valerie Vaz (in the Chair): A digital debate took place on Twitter, ahead of today??s debate. Mr Speaker has agreed that for this debate members of the public can use handheld electronic devices in the Public Gallery, provided that they are silent. Photos, however, must not be taken.

Helen Jones (Warrington North) (Lab): I beg to move,

That this House has considered the e-petition relating to contracts and conditions in the NHS.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Vaz, and, in particular, to be debating the first petition to reach the debate stage under the new system of dealing with e-petitions. The original petition on the joint Government and Parliament website called for a vote of no confidence on the Secretary of State for Health. Fortunately for him??or unfortunately, depending on how people want to look at it??the Petitions Committee does not have the power to initiate a vote of no confidence, and so we decided that the debate should be on the issue underlying the petition, which was the contracts and conditions of NHS staff.

I might be joking about motions of no confidence in the Secretary of State, but the morale of NHS staff is not a joke. It is a long time since I last saw dedicated doctors, nurses and ancillary staff so demoralised and, sometimes, despairing. If we look at the current state of the NHS we can see why. A&E departments are in crisis and missed waiting time targets for the whole of last winter. GP services are struggling to cope, and patients find it harder and harder to get appointments. Last year, the deficit across trusts was nearly £1 billion; this year, that is predicted to double.

Yet despite all that, NHS staff work miracles every day. Who could not be proud of some of the achievements of our surgeons? Who could sit in an A&E department, as I unfortunately had to during the election, seeing the endless patience of NHS staff, and not be grateful to them? Who could watch paramedics dealing with an accident or reassuring a frail and confused elderly patient and not be ever grateful for the NHS? After the Olympic opening ceremony, I remember one American reporter said, ??Oh, it??s just like praising UnitedHealthcare.?? No, it is not. The NHS is not like UnitedHealthcare, thankfully, and that is why we value it.

NHS staff have been badly treated by this Government. Since 2010 pay increases have been deliberately kept low and last year we saw some staff being told that they could not have even a 1% increase if they were due to get an increment as well. The Government often talk about public services as if they were a drain on the economy, but they are not. Services such as the NHS are a huge contributor to our economy. It is completely

14 Sep 2015 : Column 186WH

wrong that under this Government tax is cut for millionaires but dedicated NHS staff are not even entitled to a decent pay rise.

Indeed, in the previous Parliament the NHS was told to make £20 billion of what the Government call efficiency savings but the rest of us call cuts. That is due to rise to £30 billion by the end of this Parliament. The NHS is struggling to cope with fewer and fewer resources but more and more patients. Many of the difficulties being encountered are of the Government??s own making. Ministers criticise spending on agency staff, but the Government??s first act on coming into office in 2010 was to cut nurse training places by over 3,000 a year.

Michael Tomlinson (Mid Dorset and North Poole) (Con): I of course recognise the great work that NHS staff do, not least in Dorset, but is the official policy of the official Opposition now to lift pay restraint in the NHS?

Helen Jones: We made our policy quite clear in the last Parliament. In particular, we opposed the Government??s decision to curb 1% pay increases for NHS staff who were gaining increments. The hon. Gentleman really has to think about this: if there are fewer and fewer nurses in our hospitals??in particular, employment in the most senior grades is down by 3%??and we are spending millions on agency staff, something is going badly wrong. Hospitals are being forced to recruit nurses from abroad or spend on agency staff when we have thousands of people in this country who want to train as nurses but simply cannot get the training places that are available.

This is how the debate started.
It is not a debate on the subject. The reason it was debated in Westminster Hall is because they cannot have a vote of no confidence in Westminster Hall. That can only happen in the main chamber.

The government is mocking parliamentary democracy by doing this.
If you think it is not important, Ana, I do. Hopefully other members of the Labour party will.
No, I do not know anything about your finances, but you do not give the impression of someone who cares about the NHS by your comments.

Ana Wed 16-Sept-15 22:43:14

Thank you, NTO, my last was for dj, of course smile

Devorgilla Wed 16-Sept-15 22:43:58

Rosesarere - 'some like a few fireworks, and some would be happy to see MP's throwing a few actual punches and knocking each other senseless on the dispatch box.'

Damn! Missed those ones.

durhamjen Wed 16-Sept-15 22:45:04

" ...since there are far more important issues at stake" does not mean "it has already been discussed."

Grannyknot Wed 16-Sept-15 22:50:07

Yesterday, there was a debate in Westminster Hall about a vote of no confidence in Jeremy Hunt. The debate was a travesty.

Dj no wonder I'm cynical about signing petitions ...

durhamjen Wed 16-Sept-15 22:53:02

Roses might get her fireworks, etc., Devor. I think John McDonnell was one who picked up the mace at one time. Can't remember what for.

durhamjen Wed 16-Sept-15 22:56:08

There's a link to 38 degrees which worked, Grannyknot.

It's not that the petition did not work, but that the government changed the place of discussion so that it could not be debated properly. I would be surprised if there is not another one soon.

Did anyone notice Hunt at PMQs today?

NotTooOld Wed 16-Sept-15 22:57:05

Oh, was that John McDonnell, dj? I know Michael Heseltine did it once. For one with such extreme views on the economy (you might disagree with that!) I thought John McDonnell came over very well yesterday when he was interviewed on Ch4 News by John Snow.

NotTooOld Wed 16-Sept-15 23:00:49

Does anyone remember the time Jeremy Hunt was introduced by John Humphreys on Today as Jeremy Cunt? To his credit, Hunt took it very well and laughed like a drain. I did think well of him for that even if he is messing up the NHS.

durhamjen Wed 16-Sept-15 23:06:13

McDonnell is going to be on Question Time tomorrow, NotTooOld.
The mace action was to do with the third runway at Heathrow and not having a proper debate about it.
Perhaps he will do the same about the Hunt shambles.
I remember Hunt hiding from the press behind a tree.

Ana Wed 16-Sept-15 23:12:53

Yes, you do keep going on about that, while excusing JC from avoiding press questions...