A strange idea that those who read articles don't live real lives. It's possible to do both. Better to do both in fact.
From the article.
'In the House of Commons, in the debate on the EU referendum Bill, the then Minister for Europe, David Lidington, told the House that “the legislation is about holding a vote; it makes no provision for what follows. The referendum is advisory” (Hansard, June 16 2015). Yet in the most barefaced manner and contrary both to the briefing and the government statement in the House, the Brexit cabal have treated the referendum outcome as binding and mandating, in defiance of the explicit nature of the Referendum Act itself.
This is just one of many major and serious lies on which the Brexit debacle is based. The Brexiters have made up the rules as they go along, changing them when expedient, saying one thing at one time and another at another, acting with the kind of dishonesty and duplicity that one expects only of thieves.'
Goves the lie to the fact that it wasn't advisory. Strange that Brexiters have conveniently missed that out in all the articles they have written.
It's in Hansard, so it is true.