Just been checking some recent history, from the left-leaning New Statesman, that it was a Labour government that started bringing private money into the NHS while Andy Burnham was Health Secretary. Does that mean he's a right wing Tory now?
My feeling, for what it's worth, which is probably not much, is that the NHS is in desperate need of large reform. Some of it is not working very well at all. I don't know what the reforms should be but I know reforms are needed and have been needed for quite a while.
What I am in favour of is health care across the board that is free at the point of receipt, which principle is, I think, the fundamental one on which the NHS was founded. If that principle is adhered to I don't really care how it is achieved, whether all by taxation or by a combination of taxation and private money. What matters is that it works properly.
Is it not true that health services in some other European countries are funded by public and private money? Is it necessarily true that putting some private money into the NHS will make it worse?
Genuine questions because I really don't know.