I have no issue with calling an Asian Peadophile Grooming Gang out for what they are.
I have no issue with calling a White Peadophile Grooming Gang out for what they are.
I have no issue with calling any Religious Peadophile
Grooming Gang out for what they are.
Why would I be remotely concerned about doing so?
I am concerned that the context of what Sarah Champion , Ann Cryer, David Blunkett, et all have pointed out over many years is somehow deemed as 'racist' , 'potential to incite trouble' and becomes such an issue to some people that the vile abuse perpetrated by a group of people get's to be somehow lost along the way.
I don't see any posters on this thread or those threads from the start in 2014? of the Rotherham Abuse story breaking who have stated peadophilia/grooming is a Male / Asian only issue.
I do see, as I have on past threads, a concerted effort to shift the facts known and convictions that followed away from the Asian Grooming issue to a wider picture , ironically what certain posters have called when it suited them 'Whataboutery' .
Now the 'Whataboutery' aspect is to a degree valid but only if there has been no recognition of the fact peadophillia / grooming is not just a Male/Asian/Muslim problem and that has not been said , so it therefore is simply an aside to the debate. The story is about the Asian Grooming of white girls and no amount of 'Whataboutery' can stop the truth from being told , no matter how unpalatable it may be to some.
It happened.
+27785149508 ASTROLOGY TO CAST A COURT CASE SPELL TO BE DISMISSED NEAR ME
Is it ok for the tube of soap dispenser?