I’m a WASPI. I remember years ago when we were first told and I checked how long I would have to work. It turned out to be 2.25 years. I was fortunate in that I was born in the early 1950s and tbh I was not unduly concerned. However, I think the goal posts were moved again by the Tories, resulting in many having to wait even longer for their pensions.
I wouldn’t say no to some compensation and I feel that in general we have been shabbily treated. Of course, the pension age could have been rounded down so that men would have been able to retire earlier. I’d lay a bet that most ordinary people will not be able to retire at all, leaving only those who have adequate funds (the wealthy). All those on zero hours contracts, low wages may never be in that position.
As I said to dh earlier this evening, giving compensation would not have any affect on my vote. A far longer roll out would have been more acceptable. IMO it was done to save money and NOT for reasons of equality.
At least Labour seems to have conceded that there is some justification in the very real anger of women in our age group, who have been treated appallingly by Tori’s and New Labour alike.
As always in this society it is those with the least economic clout who pay the penalty for government mismanagement and the ‘take’ society.