animous they were not biased sources. They contained actually voting figures by party for every general election since about 1900 and were published in a Houses of Parliament briefing paper. Briefing papers are produced by the Hof P library, who serve all MPs and all parties and are therefore neutral. If you do not believe me, then find the time to get parliamentary votes for every constituency for every election since 1900 and work it out yourself.
OK every voter spoils their voting paper. What then?
I've heard there's been a bit of voting fraud whereby non-voters found later that their ballot paper being used by someone else - so please, SPOIL THE BALLOT PAPER.
What is the evidence for this happening in this country? Other from tittle tattle. Since all ballot papers, spoiled or not have to go in the ballot box, which are sealed before being taken to the count, are you suggesting that the tellers, counting at open tables watched by scrutineers from all parties are doing this? How?
Yes, there has been some evidence of fraud with postal votes in some places and you always have the Irish saying, 'vote early, vote often', but while all fraud should be stopped, there is remarkably little in this country.
If you are so passionate that we have a fair system, how come you think 17.4 million leavers can totally ignore the wishes of 16.1 million remainers? The tradition in Britain is that when results are this close the views of both sides should be taken into account
But, of course you are only interested in a system that meets what you want, you will not tolerate any views that do not agree with yours. that is why you damn the current system but offer no alternative.