rosecarmel
MawB
rosecarmel
Ok, boomer means Ok, boomer- Not all gransnetters- Clearly- ? Nice try tho ..
So who?
Karen- Bwa hahaha! ?
I’m joining all those who might thinking of saying (yet again)
“What on earth does that mean”
www.ladbible.com/news/weird-caren-act-to-stop-racially-motivated-911-calls-proposed-20200709?fbclid=IwAR0skM_QqKY5tjb45I0e6rhJ-v5qhGOFDzXwADi0FLtbS6l6lpUoFbRdJMQ
A new law proposed by a lawmaker in California is aimed at stopping people from making racially motivated calls to the police.
It's been proposed by San Francisco Supervisor Shamann Walton, and is called the 'CAREN' act, which stands for Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies.
Recently there has been a large uptick in incidents during which white women call the police to make reports against people of colour who they claim have made them feel uncomfortable while they're going about their daily business.
These people have become known colloquially as 'Karens'.
Calls to police can put the subject of those frivolous 911 contacts in danger of arrest for a crime they haven't committed, or an interaction with the police that could otherwise have been avoided.
Just recently, Amy Cooper called the police on a man who was birdwatching in a New York park because he'd asked her if she could put her dog onto a leash.
Then, closer to where the law is being proposed, Jennifer Schulte called the police when she saw two black men having a barbecue in a park.
A woman also threatened to call the cops on a man for stenciling 'Black Lives Matter' in chalk on his own house.
This new law aims to punish those who think they can use the police to intimidate people of colour who have done nothing wrong.
Walton argues that the proposed measures 'are part of a larger nationwide movement to address racial biases and implement consequences for weaponizing emergency resources with racist intentions'.
It's similar to a bill put forward by California State Assembly member Rob Bonta that calls for people who use law enforcement in a way that is biased towards people for their race, class, appearance, or religion.
Speaking about that piece of legislation, Bonta said: "This bill could protect millions of Californians from becoming targets of hate and prevent the weaponization of our law enforcement against communities of colour."
Let's hope that it makes a difference.
rosecarmel
MawB
rosecarmel
Ok, boomer means Ok, boomer- Not all gransnetters- Clearly- ? Nice try tho ..
So who?
Karen- Bwa hahaha! ?
I’m joining all those who might thinking of saying (yet again)
“What on earth does that mean”
Well, I am of the opinion that there isn’t any real point or meaning in all the pronouncements coming thick and fast starblaze and rosecarmel.If there was, you would be saying so.
However, if people in a discussion are focused on twisting what I say or assigning meaning to my words that aren't there, or just generally looking for ways to shut me down personally it becomes pointless for me.
Come on Starblaze that's neither true nor fair! A discussion goes both ways and when someone, anyone, makes a statement of opinion it's not unreasonable for other people to ask for clarification. No one is trying to "shut you down" or "twisting" anything and it's disingenuous to suggest that.
MawB
rosecarmel
MawB
rosecarmel
Ok, boomer means Ok, boomer- Not all gransnetters- Clearly- ? Nice try tho ..
So who?
Karen- Bwa hahaha! ?
I’m joining all those who might thinking of saying (yet again)
“What on earth does that mean”
Joining all those with Pied Piper Syndrome?
rosecarmel
MawB
rosecarmel
Ok, boomer means Ok, boomer- Not all gransnetters- Clearly- ? Nice try tho ..
So who?
Karen- Bwa hahaha! ?
Hahaha!!!
What was the generation before boomers? I’m generation X.
Boomer, along with woke, have died a death in every sense (other than ironic). I’m sure Karen will soon go the same way.
I’d like to think you were right Starblaze, but I have a nasty feeling Starmer might be Blair mk2.
Gagajo I'm just watching quietly, obviously a lot of focus on the immediate issues we face at the moment. He certainly has a strong presense and interested to see how he does on other issues. Keeping my mind open.
What on earth are these people on about. All you Karen’s be proud, we don’t have to follow America, what a lot of rubbish, be careful, soon we will be blamed for what we are thinking.
Is it only white women who make false accusations against black people? In the case of the man stencilling "Black Lives Matter" on the wall of his property, there were two people involved - a husband and a wife. Although the wife was the person who primarily spoke to the householder, she was backed up by her husband. Presumably she had the idea that her carefully mannered, patronising tone and her frequent use of the word "sir" to address the householder would demonstrate what a cultured and reasonable person she was. I don't know how that householder kept his cool - underneath it all he must have been fuming but he dealt with the situation brilliantly.
What this couple and other people have done is despicable but why give this sort of behaviour a woman's name? I think it is cruel and misogynistic. Primarily, though, it turns the issue of racism into a sort of cartoon character (and a female one at that) and in so doing trivialises a very serious issue.
rosecarmel I expect police time is wasted in a lot of different ways and should be punished. However, these particular examples of wasting police time have a strong racial dimension and should be called out for what they are - racism in action. It, in effect, reinforces and takes advantage of a racist stereotype to target an individual or group, thus having the potential to put them in a very dangerous situation.
Eloethan my favourite part was when she said she knew the homeowner.
It's an ongoing process and currently while the tides for change are running high every opportunity to make a difference is being taken advantage of and I don't mean take advantage in a bad way-
Karen might fall by the wayside and be referred to as something else in time- But everything is happening so fast and it's more important to get the law in place than what to call it-
The stimulus package/s is/was a cluster-f***- And unemployment- Celebrities filed for small business loans and received millions .. while millions struggle to feed their families- Moratoriums to protect renters and home owners are being lifted which could result in 28 million homeless people and about 30% of restaurants across the country are expected to close permanently- Cases of covid are rising- And rabid racists are crawling out of the woodwork ..
It's really a huge mess .. Karen is the least of my concerns .. but only at the moment ..
That's not at all predictable. How many times have we heard this. Be quiet women, it's not the right time, your needs are not important.
I am able to have concern about racism, unemployment and call out misogyny when I see it.
Is there another way to look at this?
KAREN, a term used by some to describe women who display privileged, overbearing or racist behaviour (which is a problem among women that we need to address to make it go away) which is obviously quite unfair to nice women named Karen.
Has become
CAREN, an act to make it a criminal offence to call the police unjustly on individuals who are breaking no laws or simply existing in spaces they have every right to be in. Which is a positive thing and not a negative.
That would be good except their is no "Caren" movement. It is actually known as "Karen", not Caren. And the definition of "a Karen" is:
Karen is a pejorative term used in the United States and other English-speaking countries for a woman perceived to be entitled or demanding beyond the scope of what is considered appropriate or necessary. A common stereotype is that of a racist white woman who uses her privilege to demand her own way at the expense of others. Depictions also include demanding to "speak to the manager", being an anti-vaxxer, or having a particular bob cut hairstyle. As of 2020, the term was increasingly being used as a general-purpose term of disapproval for middle-aged white women.
So the use of this term is pejorative against those women who happen to be called Karen; is misogynistic and unfairly racially profiles white, middle aged women. Not much to like about it really.
Bloody well said Chewbacca
I don't believe it profiles white middle aged women in general Chewbacca just a certain type of woman I personally don't want to be associated with, although I would never use that term to discribe them.
Well, the criteria for "being a Karen" is fairly extensive, according to the direct quote:
White
Femail
Entitled
Demanding
Middle aged
Having a "particular hairstyle"
That's fairly generic, wouldn't you say?
Not if you aren't entitled or demanding, or do you believe most women are Chewbacca?
So of the 6 so called characteristics, you've picked up on 2 negative stereotypes? 
I believe that there are as many "entitled or demanding" women as there are "entitled or demanding" men, Starblaze. Some of them are white. Some of them have their hair cut in a particular style. And some of them are called Karen. Or Susan. Or Bill.
But to selectively identify a whole demographic of white femails, of a particular age, is misogynistic, offensive and lazy. And I find it depressingly sad that another middle aged woman cannot see that.
I can see there is a problem with a certain type of women Cheebacca who believes they are deserving of special treatment and that they are generally more important than others. They believe they should be listened to above others and their opinion is the be all and end all on every conversation. They also seem to believe they are above telling the truth or any kind of morals to get their own way.
Calling them Karen's is not OK but that sort of woman lets the rest of us down and that sort of behaviour should be called out clearly.
I can see there is a problem with a certain type of women. There certainly is Starblaze! But the problem with lumping white, middle aged women, who display less than attractive traits, into one huge homogeneous mass and then labelling them "Karen", is divisive, misogynistic, sexist, unfair and counter productive.
Are you a man Starblaze ?
That's what I am saying though Cheebacca it's far from all women.
It's not mysogyny to say I don't like the behaviour of some women
It's not misandry to say I don't like the behaviour of some men
It is feminism to say that I believe in equal rights and opportunities for everyone.
These women we are speaking of do not believe in equal rights or oportunity as they clearly demonstrate
From the definition given about ‘Karens’ it seems they (middle aged to older white women)are being talked about in a way that for any other group you could mention would be considered outrageous.
equal rights or opportunities for everyone
Including all the Karens of the world ?
These women
and which women would they be, exactly?
Anyone called Karen?
As I said previously, this extremely stupid idea of using a woman's (and in some cultures a man's) name to typify a group of women with a racist, histrionic personality disorder is not only very wrong, it detracts from the serious issues at stake.
It's hardly ever a mams name, it's always a womans.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.