The majority of the posts on the website are not from 14 year olds talking about being too drunk to consent. I saw one that said the girl/woman was passing in and out of consciousness, but in most cases (and I haven’t read it all) it is not like that at all - the girls are clearly victims of assault with no reference to alcohol.
The other story in the papers is the one I linked to upthread where head teachers are talking about how difficult it can be to be expected to arbitrate when very young people have different versions of what happened in incidents that took place out of school.
I think that the two things are different. In the former, there has definitely been assault, but in the latter, there are more grey areas. If the boy had behaved in the way of the boys/men in the testimonies on the website then it is assault, but if there was an incident where there were mixed messages or misread signals, particularly if drink was involved and memories fuzzy, then I think it would be wrong to automatically assume that only the boy was at fault, particularly as being labelled a sex offender would ruin his life.
This is not to excuse unwanted advances, and not to disbelieve girls’ accounts over those of boys. It’s just that there will be occasions when both parties are inexperienced and have different versions of events, and it would take the wisdom of Solomon to decide where the ‘truth’ lies. More education about alcohol would be really useful to stop these situations from arising.