HolySox
Chardy You say 'parties', I say government meetings.
I accept Boris thought he was, at the time, keeping within the rules, the law, whatever, with his style of government / management. As such, he hasb't been lying and wasn't deliberately trying to mislead parliment. He has now been found 'guilty' and fined so has accepted this and apologized.
I also accept NS made a genuine mistake not wearing her face mask. She wasn't fined despite the evidence being incontrovertible and so had no option to acknowledge her mistake and apologise.
Were you there, to have been able to judge that these were not parties?
Do you not think that the police, with access to all the evidence, are better equipped to make judgements about this and the seriousness of any breaking of rules?
Do you always accept apologies, even if they are given under duress and the speaker's insincerity is blatantly obvious?
Can you not see the different level of guilt between NS's momentary lapse of concentration, rectified as soon as it is realized, and BJ's seemingly habitual record of lying and denying?
Most of us have probably, on the odd occasion, done exactly the same as NS and forgotten our mask momentarily. I know that I have, and like her, I put it on the moment I realized. If a police officer had seen me without it, I doubt very much that they would have fined me, but rather just reminded me / warned me to put it on.
I have not, however, at any time since Covid restrictions first began, attended anything that might be seen as a rule-breaking gathering, and I don't think that many people have. Those who did risked being reported by neighbours and being fined. They knew the risks. It was a deliberate act, and they knew the possible consequences.
To me, there is simply no comparison between the two, and I find it almost childish when people start trying to say that one is as bad as the other