Whitewavemark2
Whitewavemark2
MaizieD
So my ideal government is
One presiding over a capitalist economy
You should be loving our current government then...
I am really shocked that people forget about mixed economies.
You then don’t give consideration to my third sentence?
Just to expand on what I mean.
My theory is that everything flows from the economic order.
I may not necessarily think it is the ideal, but I think that at present our present level of political maturity only works with a capitalist system.
I recognise that of its nature the capitalist economic system is one of exploitation. Exploitation being used in an objective sense. I also argue that business does not necessarily exploit resources for the common good, like air and soil quality and other such.
Because of this I think we need a strong democratic state, that uses the rule of law to control this exploitation of resources.
So this included resources such as labour, and raw materials, but also air quality, soil quality, etc.
Control may therefore take the form of state managed resources. This can be achieved both by the rule of law e.g. prevention of further carbon exploitation, or by nationalisation, like water - (I think that there is a strong argument for this) or other resources.
So in effect I see a mixed economy as possibly necessary in order to give a smooth running to a capitalist economy, allowing for fair access to resources, and oiling the wheels like good public transport to get people too and from work.
In my view a mixed economy has nothing to do with the socialisation of an economy, but an economy that is focused on the efficient and fair running of a market economy.