A point I have wanted to make on a few of these threads, but can’t quite articulate, is about the difference in tone about the IndyRef debate in Scotland and England.
It’s a bit long, sorry, and forgive any typos, I’m on my phone and a bit short of time.
I had a job at the time that saw me travelling a lot in Scotland, meeting people from all sorts of communities, backgrounds and political views, as well as living in a Tory seat, and engaging with folk there during my everyday activities.
And the debate was everywhere, and nobody was shy about raising the issue. From older women on the bus in Edinburgh, to a 16 year old busker inGlasgow, or the middle aged white chair of the local Tory party (a friend of mine, it may surprise some to read) , from former mining villages to the Hebrides, everyone I encountered was talking about the pros and cons of independence. And whether they were for or agin, they were knowledgeable about the issues and they had cogent arguments for their views. The undecided were always willing to listen, I think, to both sides, and to research and learn. As a result the quality of the debate, irl, was high and based on what people genuinely thought was best for Scotland. (I say irl advisedly - see my earlier views on cyber-nats)
A couple of weeks before the vote, I travelled back to England to spend time with family and friends, and was shocked, and upset (my country etc etc) by both the poor quality of the debate there, and the tone of it. The media were not providing anything approaching balanced information, and all the political parties seemed determined to create a vitriolic, spiteful environment that was aimed at killing meaningful discussion
But more - worse to me - than that, there was constant misrepresentation of the debate and its actual and potential impact on Scotland. This was not about the impact of independence, although there was that too, it was a carefully crafted message - full of lies - that even daring to discuss the matter had riven Scotland from end to end, torn apart communities and families, while at the same time most people in Scotland couldn’t care less, didn’t understand the issues, and weren’t engaged at all- there was just a lot of noise from a few radicals. And all of this is a tone I can only describe as both sneering and fatuous.
I spoke to as many people as I could whilst I was there, accosting market traders, raising the issue at various communities out and social activities, making my family ask their friends, from Yorkshire to the south coast via East Anglia, and it was depressing how many people were taking what they were told at face value, and how it was influencing their views of Scotland. I suspect it continues to do so
Looking back, it feels a bit like a forerunner of the Brexit campaign led by England.
It would be shame, IMO, if Scots adopted the English method in any discussion about a future IndyRef.