Harry and Meghan- Netflix Trailer.

I did actually start watching it but was nauseated. I've posted on the other thread. I really don't think I can make it through six episodes.

You do seem rather obsessed with this couple Chestnut.

I like Harry and Meghan. They are flawed like all humans. However i think Charles and Andrew are much worse with their connections to peodophiles. I'm really suspicious how Savile managed to get away with what he did during his lifetime. John Lydon tried to get his crimes out in the open but the establishment stopped him.

Good old John.

MissAdventure

Good old John.

Yes unfortunately the press painted him as nothing but a yob so no one took him seriously.

He said there were plenty of others, too.
I don't suppose we'll ever know for sure.

We may on the 15th when all will be revealed….

Forsythia

We may on the 15th when all will be revealed….

Wow would happen if thatch come out? Surely Charles would have to abdicate?

It is headline news here again today and more and more mentions of a future republic. Also some commentators saying Harry has serious mental problems. Just when I thought it was all over,too. I must say the washing of dirty linen in public doesn’t do their image much good.

Is there anybody left who actually gives a tinker's cuss about what the Sussexes do?

As long as they're not trashing the RF then no, I "don't give a tinker's cuss" Questingvole

Andrew has never been connected to a Pedophile or Paedophilia as this relates to a preference to prepubescent child or children, ie. Children under the age of 13. 17 is not prepubescent. As for Saville. Like many of us I doubt that Charles had any idea what this man was really like, it was well hidden by all, probably because he raised so much money for charity. To try and take Charles to task over a man who died 11/12 years ago is clearly absurd.

Didn’t realise Harry has recorded more interviews in anticipation of his autobiography being published next week.

A Tom Bradby interview to be shown next Sunday on ITV.

I suppose we shouldn't be surprised should we. There was a short clip on ITV's news and it was same old same old, with an added how much he wants his father and brother back and to be a part of his family.

Stop whinging and bitching Harry, and you may still have a chance.

Jaberwok

Andrew has never been connected to a Pedophile or Paedophilia as this relates to a preference to prepubescent child or children, ie. Children under the age of 13. 17 is not prepubescent. As for Saville. Like many of us I doubt that Charles had any idea what this man was really like, it was well hidden by all, probably because he raised so much money for charity. To try and take Charles to task over a man who died 11/12 years ago is clearly absurd.

Andrew has never been connected to a Pedophile or Paedophilia as this relates to a preference to prepubescent child or children

I thought Andrew was friends with Epstein?
There are well-substantiated claims that Epstein was provided with girls as young as 12.

I doubt that Charles knew anything about his brother's friend's proclivities.

of fgs can't we stick to the title,,,,,harry

I was replying to a post I saw.

Are you the Thread Police?

Am I the only person to be sickened by all the promotion BBC, ITV, Radio and the press are all giving to this book wot Harry has wrote? Articles in the Telegraph for the past three days, items on every news bulletin and pictures of the Spare glowering from news websites and pop-ups, and I was invited by W.H, Smiths to order a copy in advance for half-price.

Yes - is it news?

Sorry to be M&H bashing but DH, who is generally not at all interested in them, just saw H on the main news and asked if he was exceptionally thick as H seems to be unaware that his actions just might cause distress to those he professes to love and miss.

He certainly doesn't come across as being very bright does he.

Harry’s complete lack of self awareness is astonishing isn’t it?

There has been the Oprah interview, the Netflix attack and as if all that wasn’t enough, there’s a forthcoming book, which of course needs to be plugged.

After all that does he seriously expect his family to be ready for a joyful reunion?

Why can’t he be interviewed by somebody like Emily Maitlis instead of the sycophantic Tom Bradby?

He has a book to flog. Whoopi-do. It’ll just be more of the same….Poor me!

He needs challenging.

Harry has chosen his old mate Tom Bradby to interview him.
As much as I dislike Harry, he’s not on trial.

He’d be an even bigger fool if he chose Maitliss to interview him, after what happened with his Uncle.

merlot you have answered your own question... because Emily Maitlis is likely to ask actual questions and may want answers.

lemsip

of fgs can't we stick to the title,,,,,harry

Why? Both Charles and Andrew have had connections to prolific paedophiles. I don't trust them. Charles lied all the way his marriage and exploited a teenage girl ( Diana). Harry is a bit of annoying but you can always ignore him. I think he upsets a lot of the British public because they don't want to admit that they've been worshipping a bunch of oddballs all these years.