Oh come on! Anyone can read the misrepresentation that has been undertaken.
As I see it, the claims of being misrepresented are coming from VS, and there are several posters saying that no, her comments were read as I read them.
It is a common device used by at least one poster regularly.
Who? It's difficult to respond without knowing who you are talking about, and to which posts you refer.
Really blaming VS is beyond the pail.. And threads are never shut down just for one comment being reported, only for consistent and irrelevant personal remarks.
Why is it 'beyond the pale' to point out that VS's comments were ill-judged at best? I have explained why I read them as I did, and why they are offensive, and the defence is that VS sees herself as someone who would never say such a thing, is 'LGBTQ+', so that means that her comments can't possibly be nasty. I, for one, remain unconvinced. If VS really felt that her comments, complete with goady '😉', had been misunderstood and that she didn't mean to cause hurt, she could have retracted them, but no - instead there have been numerous posts from her saying over and over again that it is she who has been upset, and making the thread yet another one that is all about her.
It's pathetic to try and blame someone for reporting a post.
It is anyone's right to post their point of view, and I very much doubt that calling someone's view 'pathetic' is in the spirit of GN.
I can see that the ground is getting difficult- What do you call a penis on a transman, if not a penis?
When did you stop beating your wife? I wouldn't call a penis on a transman anything, as transmen don't have penises.
but pretending it's VS's fault if it is shut down is pretty low.
I haven't pretended anything, or seen anyone else pretend anything. VS is the only person who has admitted to reporting posts, though, so if the thread is shut down (which I very much doubt will happen) then who is to blame?
Especially as we have just discovered there are more women who are really men!
Well, that depends on what being 'really men' is taken to mean, doesn't it? That is an interesting article, and I can't pretend to fully understand the detail of the science, but it seems that there are chromosomal abnormalities that mean that some women have undeveloped male characteristics. That these are often undiagnosed until the women realise that they are unable to conceive suggests that they are not giving rise to 'feelings' of being 'in the wrong body', but obviously I don't know. I would suggest, however, that a woman who is trying to conceive a child is unlikely to see herself as male, and may well, like other people with DSDs, prefer to distance herself from the whole trans debate. Whatever the case, though, there should be counselling and medical assistance for those people to medically transition if that is what they want to do. It is not remotely the same as deciding you are female the day before you are about to be sentenced for rape.