Interesting article - Harry the trauma exhibitionist.

You can actually see the side eyes that Catherine, Zara and camilla were doing when the black pastor was giving his sermon

Oh come on! That sermon began as a joyous declaration of two peoples’ love for one another but went on and on…and on to the point where those in the congregation, more used to restrained speeches started to see the funny side of such an over the top performance.

Race had absolutely nothing to do with it. Many of us have sat through sermons delivered by white members of the clergy while trying not to giggle.

Even Harry and Meghan exchanged a couple of sideways glances.

Some people will manage to uncover racism in a donkey’s hind leg if they try hard enough. 🤔

What Harry and Meghan do and say, is of very little interest to me. The same as the rest of the RF - I simply don't care.🥴

Whatever.

But, I do think the right wing media are using H&M to bury bad (political) news... anything the Tories have fouled up is buried under a welter of royal drivel...Kate's latest new clothes, what William thinks about Harry, what Kate thinks, what Charles thinks.., yada yada.🙄

Leave them be - they, unlike the rest, are not costing us anything. Not our problem.😗

You should seen the side eyes we were making last Christmas when our parish priest decided that Midnight Mass was an appropriate time for a long theological sermon. He could not be more white European, but the subject and length were too long for the occasion.

That is exactly what happened at H&M's wedding. Someone expected to make a brief sermon, went on for far too long and everyone was wonderin, in an embarrassed way when he was ever going to stop,

I agree merlotgran.

4 men a racist country make , !

Gosh you all think racism is funny I was actually using the incident today as an example, the sneering comments about it only 4 people are really telling. There has been a huge investigation which has found the Met to be institutionally racist.

So what if the pastor went on a bit. I've been to longer services. It's the way that some cultures worship. The coronation went on a bit and some people have compared it to Monty python sketch Catherine and Zara kept a straight face there. These people are incredibly privileged sitting on a mass of wealth but they can't remain professional in front.of cameras.

As for Meghan looking at Charlotte . She's got a veil on but I'm not seeing hate. Her smile slipped but she had just had.a row about Charlotte's dress so she was may have been peeved. She is human being after all.

DiamondLily

What Harry and Meghan do and say, is of very little interest to me. The same as the rest of the RF - I simply don't care.🥴

Whatever.

But, I do think the right wing media are using H&M to bury bad (political) news... anything the Tories have fouled up is buried under a welter of royal drivel...Kate's latest new clothes, what William thinks about Harry, what Kate thinks, what Charles thinks.., yada yada.🙄

Leave them be - they, unlike the rest, are not costing us anything. Not our problem.😗

Yep the are used to make us forget the country is not doing well.

This was an obvious blow as it left them with only Harry's £30 million from his mother and Meghans $5 million. Sounds like an absolute fortune
Jaberwok Don't forget the £14 million which was left to William and Harry by the Queen Mother, the larger share to go to Harry as the younger child, who would not receive as much funding from public money.

Calendargirl

^You can actually see the side eyes that Catherine, Zara and Camilla were doing when the black pastor was giving his sermon^.

And no wonder! Talk about not knowing when to shut up! I assume his rant (sorry sermon) over ran somewhat, and timing is quite important in royal circles.

Oh, I loved him, but must admit I was giggling at the length of the sermon. I'd like to go to one of his services.
Thank goodness I wasn't able to go to the wedding! I could have been caught on camera.

Daddima

Anniebach

Example of racist comments from press ?

And ‘death threats from far right groups’?
And surely the comparing of their child to a chimpanzee was a posting of a photograph by Danny Baker, for which he subsequently lost his job?
I do believe the claim in the article linked by Wellsrose that people with African or Asian sounding surnames find it more difficult to get job interviews.

Meghan must have passed the job interview because she got the job.

Mind you, she probably didn't listen during the months of induction.

Danny Baker I won't repeat your post Daddima
Well, he's just vile, isn't he.
He doesn't reflect the views of the majority, just a few sick individuals.

Itss strange that the RoyAl are obsessed with their own protocol , curtesying, walking in order of seniority and referring to them by their titles. But really this showed they have the manners of pigs when it comes to other people's culture.

M0nica

You should seen the side eyes we were making last Christmas when our parish priest decided that Midnight Mass was an appropriate time for a long theological sermon. He could not be more white European, but the subject and length were too long for the occasion.

That is exactly what happened at H&M's wedding. Someone expected to make a brief sermon, went on for far too long and everyone was wonderin, in an embarrassed way when he was ever going to stop,

Oh goodness, you should have heard the (white) curate at my DD's christening.
Talk about fire and brimstone, hell and damnation !! On and on he went.
Everyone still remembers it all these years later.

Calliste. Meghan's name isn't African or Indian sounding.

WellsRose

Calliste. Meghan's name isn't African or Indian sounding.

So there was no point in your link then.

Calliste isn't my name either.
It sounds quite French though, reflects my ancestry 😁

Of course there is a point as it didn't just include that one sentence.

Callistemon21

Calliste isn't my name either.
It sounds quite French though, reflects my ancestry 😁

Yes I gathered that as it's an anonymous forum. Who are referring to you say 'either'?

As for Meghan looking at Charlotte . She's got a veil on but I'm not seeing hate. Her smile slipped but she had just had.a row about Charlotte's dress so she was may have been peeved. She is human being after all..

Ah yes, this self assured actress was still so peeved about a disagreement over a dress she couldn’t hide her displeasure when engaging with a three year old little girl.

She is human after all. 🤔

Peeved with a three year , says much about the woman

I think you are wrong wellsrose when you say that this whole thread was to berate Harry and Meghan and say vile things about them.

I think this thread was about an opinion piece. The article was linked at the start. It made me think about something I'd not really noticed before.

Just saying.

merlotgran

^As for Meghan looking at Charlotte . She's got a veil on but I'm not seeing hate. Her smile slipped but she had just had.a row about Charlotte's dress so she was may have been peeved. She is human being after all.^.

Ah yes, this self assured actress was still so peeved about a disagreement over a dress she couldn’t hide her displeasure when engaging with a three year old little girl.

She is human after all. 🤔

It was her wedding day. Most people are more stressed and emotional on their wedding day. She stopped smiling for whatever reason and as none of us can read minds. something completely disconnected to Charlotte that stopped her smiling. She might have suddenly been thinking about whether she would have her own daughter. She didn't do a my harm did she?

Anniebach

Peeved with a three year , says much about the woman

If we don't get peeved with three year olds how on earth will they learn how to behave?

...what's all this about a dress?

She certainly has full support from republicans