Anniebach
Harry is a member of the press pack
Do you have proof of this?
A Swell Idea From ASDA To Deter Shoplifters!
I am not a messy person but...
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Interesting article - Harry the trauma exhibitionist.
(719 Posts)meron152.substack.com/p/prince-harry-the-trauma-exhibitionist
I came across this article posted on MN.
It strikes me as very perceptive as Harry yet again drags up his mother’s death at the Invictus Games.
It’s so inappropriate and disrespectful to those thousands of injured servicemen and their relatives that an over-privileged, extremely wealthy individual constantly turns the subject to himself.
I love to see children being children instead of being dressed up in expensive designer clothes in wxpensive carriages whilst their subjects are struggling to get an education due to their schools crumbling.
I agree WellsRose, a time and a place to be a child in casual clothing!
Lexisgranny
*Glorianny*. I am neither a Royalist nor a Republican, but I think your comments regarding “parading’” the Wales children are totally uncalled for. In my opinion their parents have been introducing them very gradually to Royal duties which as public occasions have naturally been photographed. As far as I recall photographs are released on birthdays, when visiting church with the other members of the Royal Family and at the beginning of a new school year, this hardly constitutes parading. As my grandmother used to say ‘No one ever won an argument by exaggerating. The Sussexes have merely created unnecessary speculation by restricting their children’s exposure to the general public.
Why do the public speculate over small children? Sounds creepy to me. Most celebrities keep their children out of the public eye and H&M are no longer Royals and the kids are entitled to a private life.
I find the fact that you only ever appear on threads about Harry and Meghan, defending them so vigorously whilst denigrating working members of the Royal Family very odd, WellsRose.
Callistemon21
I find the fact that you only ever appear on threads about Harry and Meghan, defending them so vigorously whilst denigrating working members of the Royal Family very odd, WellsRose.
Luckily i don't care what you find odd.
This is interesting -a completely different take on Harry and the Invictus documentary www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a44964035/prince-harry-heart-of-invictus-hat/
Anniebach
The Prince and Princess of Wales are not on Instagram with their children feeding chickens or on the beach
Yes they are - thewalesfamily.
Today’s picture is of the late Queen and they often post photos of the children.
lemsip
Prince Harry is due to arrive in UK TODAY as he makes fleeting solo visit to attend tonight's WellChild Awards on the eve of the anniversary of the Queen's death - but Meghan won't join him
Oh, that's nice. He might meet up with some of his cousins.
Will it be on TV?
Its all such a pity. Harry and Meghan started out so well and could have gone on to be a great asset both to the RF, this Country/Commonwealth. They would almost certainly by now be enormously popular and respected world wide, and could have done so much good both here and overseas. No money worries,no security fears, less restricted than William and Catherine who bear a much greater burden, and could probably have done with the support H & M could have afforded. They didn't want to so that's ok, living your own life, earning your own money is fine. What's not fine is trashing your family with mostly lies, and using your dead mother to make megga bucks because this is the only way you have to keep up your millionaire life style. An honest days work is not within Harry's grasp as he has no life skills to offer any would be employer . To see what this once engaging popular Prince has become is as tragic as the late Duke of Windsor, in fact,apart from the family trashing, it's a very similar pattern.
His wife was getting death threats from far right groups. The press were also racist. Meghan was never going to accepted by true Royalist because she didnt the mould. The family never came out and spke up for them. Too busy ensuring theirr own popularity. Their silence on racista family member was as bad as selling any book. Harry has a duty to put his children first way above his father.
Example of racist comments from press ?
The "racism" jibe is just so much trumped up tosh. The British public loved Meghan as evidenced by the cheering thousands at the wedding BUT her prima donna-ish behaviour and refusal to act like any of the other members of the RF , including her disrespect for the Queen quickly became evident.
Nobody saw her as a "woman of colour" until she started to make a thing of it. On her own admission she is "not black enough" to play women of colour!
However this thread was ostensibly about Harry and his spurious claims of no support after he left the army and whingeing about "poor me". Moans which do not sit well with the sheer bravery of army veteran amputees or those truly traumatised by their service. The men and women of Invictus. It is despite his victim stance not about Harry
Yes please, I'm really interested to have media quotes. As far as I can remember Meghan was welcomed with open arms both by the RF, who bent over backwards to welcome her, particularly HLM, the general public and the press, who were so pleased that Harry had at last found happiness. There was no racist member of the family. Harry confirmed that this accusation was a lie at the Tom Bradby interview. In passing, Catherine and Camilla endured far worse than Meghan, but ok, they wanted to leave, the late Queen and the then Prince Charles agreed to support them financially for a whole 12 months to give them time to finally decide their future. Goodness, what a generous gesture! My family were very supportive when we were newly weds, but not to that extent!! After 12 months they made their position clear and the financial support ceased, as per the arrangement. This was an obvious blow as it left them with only Harry's £30 million from his mother and Meghans $5 million. Sounds like an absolute fortune, but perhaps not in the world of H & M.
Agree Foxygloves
Foxygloves
The "racism" jibe is just so much trumped up tosh. The British public loved Meghan as evidenced by the cheering thousands at the wedding BUT her prima donna-ish behaviour and refusal to act like any of the other members of the RF , including her disrespect for the Queen quickly became evident.
Nobody saw her as a "woman of colour" until she started to make a thing of it. On her own admission she is "not black enough" to play women of colour!
However this thread was ostensibly about Harry and his spurious claims of no support after he left the army and whingeing about "poor me". Moans which do not sit well with the sheer bravery of army veteran amputees or those truly traumatised by their service. The men and women of Invictus. It is despite his victim stance not about Harry
I actually dont think a lot of people realised that she was was a woman of colour until the wedding and that is when the press and public turned on her. You can actually see the side eyes that Catherine, Zara and camilla were doing when the black pastor was giving his surname
Have you sern that 4 men have admitted to sending racist texts about Meghan and these are not silly little boys. They are retired police officers in their 60s! Still think its made up tosh?
Why should she be like the other royals. She is from a completely different background.
Sermon not surname before some smart Alec pulls me up on it.
Totally agree with Foxgloves. Harry in 2017 praised his brother William for comforting him and urging him to seek help, as did allegedly his two aids. This like most of Harry's utterances, changes with the wind!
Foxygloves
The "racism" jibe is just so much trumped up tosh. The British public loved Meghan as evidenced by the cheering thousands at the wedding BUT her prima donna-ish behaviour and refusal to act like any of the other members of the RF , including her disrespect for the Queen quickly became evident.
Nobody saw her as a "woman of colour" until she started to make a thing of it. On her own admission she is "not black enough" to play women of colour!
However this thread was ostensibly about Harry and his spurious claims of no support after he left the army and whingeing about "poor me". Moans which do not sit well with the sheer bravery of army veteran amputees or those truly traumatised by their service. The men and women of Invictus. It is despite his victim stance not about Harry
Yes, she seemed lovely and was very welcomed; it was especially lovely to see Harry so happy with a young woman who loved him as he did always seem to be a bit lost after his other girlfriends ditched him.
They were so well received both here and on tours overseas.
However this thread was ostensibly about Harry and his spurious claims of no support after he left the army and whingeing about "poor me". Moans which do not sit well with the sheer bravery of army veteran amputees or those truly traumatised by their service. The men and women of Invictus. It is despite his victim stance not about Harry
Yes, the thread has wandered off piste (again) and Harry claiming there was no support available to him after he left the Army is hardly credible.
There is support available to veterans through various organisations. Besides that he was not so hard-up that he could not seek private treatment if he needed it.
Perhaps he believes that talking about his problems is a way of empathising with the injured, sick and wounded servicemen and women?
These side looks were nothing compared to the look of pure hatred Meghan gave to Princess Charlotte during the wedding, when the children paraded past her. The P of W noticed, as is evident by his anxious look. Check the video its perfectly obvious.
WellsRose
Foxygloves
The "racism" jibe is just so much trumped up tosh. The British public loved Meghan as evidenced by the cheering thousands at the wedding BUT her prima donna-ish behaviour and refusal to act like any of the other members of the RF , including her disrespect for the Queen quickly became evident.
Nobody saw her as a "woman of colour" until she started to make a thing of it. On her own admission she is "not black enough" to play women of colour!
However this thread was ostensibly about Harry and his spurious claims of no support after he left the army and whingeing about "poor me". Moans which do not sit well with the sheer bravery of army veteran amputees or those truly traumatised by their service. The men and women of Invictus. It is despite his victim stance not about HarryI actually dont think a lot of people realised that she was was a woman of colour until the wedding and that is when the press and public turned on her. You can actually see the side eyes that Catherine, Zara and camilla were doing when the black pastor was giving his surname
Have you sern that 4 men have admitted to sending racist texts about Meghan and these are not silly little boys. They are retired police officers in their 60s! Still think its made up tosh?
Why should she be like the other royals. She is from a completely different background.
Have you sern that 4 men have admitted to sending racist texts about Meghan
Four men -OMG a staggering number 😜😜🤪
(Are you bring serious?)
I think the length of the sermon may have played a part more than the colour of the pastor. He did go on (and on)(and on)
Finally why should she behave like other royals?
If you take the rewards you do the job, simples.
In other words if you want the position, clothes, “celebrity” status, and privileges of rank - you have to earn them.
You can actually see the side eyes that Catherine, Zara and Camilla were doing when the black pastor was giving his sermon.
And no wonder! Talk about not knowing when to shut up! I assume his rant (sorry sermon) over ran somewhat, and timing is quite important in royal circles.
X posts Foxygloves,
You don’t think a lot of people realised she was a woman of colour until the wedding WR? Where on earth do you get that idea from?
Anniebach
Example of racist comments from press ?
And ‘death threats from far right groups’?
And surely the comparing of their child to a chimpanzee was a posting of a photograph by Danny Baker, for which he subsequently lost his job?
I do believe the claim in the article linked by Wellsrose that people with African or Asian sounding surnames find it more difficult to get job interviews.
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »