Michaela School in Brent is a highly successful Free School which has more control over its ethos (I believe) than state schools. It is run on very similar lines to my Girls' Grammar in the 1960s, no talking in corridors, assigned places at lunchtime and absolutely no wandering about the school unsupervised until in the lower sixth form. It also achieves very high academic results, and parents are made aware when their children join that they must abide by the school's ethos, including strict secularism.
The action has been started by one girl who began praying at lunch time, joined by a few others, then other muslims were pressured to join. A social media campaign was started, teachers were threatened online and physically, the school governors voted 11 to 1 to ban prayer rituals in school time, the pupil sued, hence the court action.
The school accommodation in a former former office block is limited and a separate prayer room is not an option, being against the policy of secularism and also supervision difficulties.
This action against the school is using threats, intimidation and violence in a deliberate attempt to undermine its authority. I would imagine if Katharine Birbalsingh loses the case she will leave the school and move to one of many schools which have tried to poach her, to the detriment of education in Brent.
Threatening staff members because they are following school policy does not say much for the integrity of some of these parents, if indeed they are actually parents rather than just activists. It will be interesting to know who or what is supplying the funding for this court case.