But if as many on these threads claim the gender problem is just a phase the child is passing through then surely the short term use of puberty blockers, along with counselling to alleviate the child's distress, and build a more positive attitude to the changes they will face would provide the best solution. There would be no need for long term use and the child would never need cross sex hormones.
Do 'many on these threads' claim that? I don't think so. Certainly, as someone who is neither a child psychologist or an expert in child development I wouldn't dream of it. I would say, and have said that many adolescents 'try on' different identities, whether they are subcultural groups such as goths, rolling up skirts to emulate older girls (although I think it was you, Glorianny who brought that into it), flirting with same-sex relationships, experimenting with drugs or whatever. Nobody suggests delaying puberty and giving counselling for those things, unless a child is at risk of harm, eg drug addiction. It seems to me (as a non-expert) that delaying puberty is not going to help anyway, as it is going through puberty that allows hormones and brain development to settle down and the child becomes more adult. Anyway, the Cass report recommends that affirmation is not a good thing, and Hilary Cass is an expert, so I'd rather take her word.
In the interests of free speech would you expect black students to welcome a member of the Klu Klux Klan? Or would you expect them to demonstrate and refuse to listen?
Here we go again. This is the second time you have brought the KKK into a rebuttal of one of my posts. Ridiculous. Is this from the Alabama version of the TRA playbook? Why would the KKK want to speak at a UK university? And who would dream of inviting them? I would hope that in the unlikely event that men in white hoods turned up to speak to students there would be black students who would come and argue with them alongside their white friends and those of all ethnicities. Of course I would understand if they preferred not to, but in the same way as other minority groups have argued for equality (including women who fought for female spaces) it is showing up the weakness in arguments that persuades others - banning things really doesn't.
I have been wondering (and it really is a question so if there is evidence please post it). . .
So was your previous question about the KKK not a real one then? These dances are getting tedious.