Gransnet forums

News & politics

Above inflation pay rises for teachers and NHS staff?

(63 Posts)
MaizieD Sun 21-Jul-24 11:15:29

I'm seeing it reported that Reeves may be considering 5% pay rises for some public sector workers

www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c0w43zvrq1pt

I hope that this does happen. It would put some much needed money into the economy to contribute to this 'growth' that Labour desperately needs and might not only retain employees who may be considering leaving the sector, but also tempt back some who have already left.

(It would bolster my weak confidence in the economic competence of Labour, too 😆)

Urmstongran Sun 21-Jul-24 11:21:09

Well our youngest daughter will be pleased!

GrannyIvy Sun 21-Jul-24 11:22:13

Yes both my daughters too!

silverlining48 Sun 21-Jul-24 11:24:57

I hope it happens too, it’s about time. There were ten full years when my dd didn’t get a payrise in the nhs. . Otherwise more strikes and even more people will leave public sector …and where would we be then.

maddyone Sun 21-Jul-24 11:37:23

I hope this happens. The public need to realise that if they want good public services, those services aren’t free. We have to pay for them. The private sector salary rises have apparently been running at about 5% and there is no reason at all for public sector workers to be expected to settle for less than the rest of the workforce.

I don’t think the junior doctors will settle for 5% though, and nor should they. Their pay has been devalued by 35% over the 10-14 years, and they deserve for those losses to be rectified, probably over a number of years though.

Urmstongran Sun 21-Jul-24 11:42:13

I think they’re more likely to get a settlement with Labour maddyone. Let’s hope their dispute ends soon so waiting lists don’t keep being added to.

maddyone Sun 21-Jul-24 11:46:11

I agree with Urmstongran.
The junior doctors were treated appallingly by the last government, and I’m hoping for change.

MaizieD Sun 21-Jul-24 11:52:21

The public need to realise that if they want good public services, those services aren’t free. We have to pay for them.

We don't have to pay for them. This is what I| have been banging on about for so long now.

Government spends before it taxes. It isn't financed by taxation. Taxation's main purpose is to control the amount of money there is in the economy in order to prevent demand led inflation.

Increasing the money in circulation by increasing public sector pay will increase general economic activity as the workers spend their additional money into the domestic economy.

The government will recover much of the money through taxation, i.e. by taxation of the workers' extra income and taxation of the economic activity this extra income promotes.

Whitewavemark2 Sun 21-Jul-24 12:01:20

As far as the doctors are concerned, yes, it is about pay but also about working conditions, and this is also being resolved by Streeting. So there will be a build up of goodwill, which helps.

Joseann Sun 21-Jul-24 12:04:56

The 5.5% pay rise for teachers is probably long overdue. I am in favour.

From a selfish point of view, however, I think this will cause an added problem for independent schools, who will now have that to contend with that on top of the VAT on education. Historically the pay rises awarded to teachers at private schools were just above those in state schools. This new leap will cost heavily for them to match it.

Mollygo Sun 21-Jul-24 12:05:41

Upping the pay for teachers and NHS staff-great idea! The sooner the better, especially with the introduction of a new NC.

eazybee Sun 21-Jul-24 12:40:56

It is well deserved, considering what they did during Covid, but being cynical I am wondering what strings are attached for teachers.
Cleaning children's teeth, running before and afterschool clubs, (free child minding), compulsory dinner duty?
All suggestions pre-election.
I have no idea about the NHS but am sure it will involve longer hours and more responsibility.

mabon1 Sun 21-Jul-24 12:43:31

A Tory MP was heard saying on Rdio 4 on Friiday, "The NHS needs more money" that's rich coming from a government of 14 years.

Mollygo Sun 21-Jul-24 12:47:23

easybee
Well put👏👏
I remember one of our early OFSTED reports criticised us because so few teachers were running before/after school clubs.

Urmstongran Sun 21-Jul-24 12:58:46

Bad behaviour isn't the kid's fault but nothing focused on them will work unless you fix their parents. Hold parents responsible and have mandatory parenting classes for parents of habitual offenders. Meanwhile, don't sacrifice the many for the few.

Rosie51 Sun 21-Jul-24 13:02:45

While I welcome the news for teachers and NHS staff I notice there's no mention of giving the police or prison officers a decent rise. These are two professions for whom it is illegal to strike, but I'm sure that has no bearing on any government decisions on their pay 🙄

silverlining48 Sun 21-Jul-24 14:05:26

Police pay is also under review. I hope. Sil is a police officer as was my dh so I know how hard the work is.
In fact we are or were public servants in our small family. All used to poor pay and conditions.

Grandmabatty Sun 21-Jul-24 14:07:01

There were parenting classes called Sure Start until The Tories cancelled them.

AGAA4 Sun 21-Jul-24 14:25:09

It's a very positive move and needed. Public sector workers have had a raw deal for many years.
My DD and SiL have both left teaching now and work as private tutors. They hadn't had a pay rise for far too long and the conditions for teachers now are dreadful.
The school my sil left had no physics teachers left after he resigned.
The pay for junior doctors up to now has been appallingly low and I hope they are given a substantial rise.

GrannyGravy13 Sun 21-Jul-24 14:34:24

Grandmabatty

There were parenting classes called Sure Start until The Tories cancelled them.

There are still over 2,000 Sure Start Centres in England.

Whitewavemark2 Sun 21-Jul-24 14:41:06

GrannyGravy13

Grandmabatty

There were parenting classes called Sure Start until The Tories cancelled them.

There are still over 2,000 Sure Start Centres in England.

They have been much reduced and were never progressed as it was intended.

The Cameron government ensured that.

silverlining48 Sun 21-Jul-24 14:45:21

There were about 3,500 zSure Starts and as a social worker I saw how successful they were.
Tories closed down 1500. A short sighted decision.

Mollygo Sun 21-Jul-24 14:55:21

Silverlining48
Labour started the closures, because they were unviable or maybe they didn’t have the funding.
Conservatives carried on and once you close some, others will follow, especially if there isn’t the funding to keep the successful ones open.
You can read on GN the different experiences of people with regard to SureStart. Those that were well used and those that were underused.

silverlining48 Sun 21-Jul-24 15:18:19

It’s my understanding that closures began w ith the Tory/ Lib Dem coalition and continued by the Tory government.

MaizieD Sun 21-Jul-24 15:27:03

silverlining48

It’s my understanding that closures began w ith the Tory/ Lib Dem coalition and continued by the Tory government.

I can't find anything about Labour cutting Sure Start. The responsibility for funding them was transferred to local councils by Gordon Brown, which probably accounts for what happened next.

It appears that closures started after the 2010 election of the tory/LibDem government as local council funding was cut in the name of 'austerity'.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sure_Start