Whitewavemark2
HousePlantQueen
Kandinsky
In terms of disabled children/people, I very much value these people and feel that they add value to our lives
Our very own NHS sees things differently - which is why they offer all pregnant women tests to check for Down’s syndrome ( and a couple of other syndromes ) and if these tests are positive they offer a free of charge termination.
something like 90% of parents do terminate a Down’s syndrome pregnancy.
What do you think of this NHS service?
I think it is pro choice. What are you trying to imply?
I worked in a school with children with severe physical and cognitive disabilities.
In my opinion, actively keeping some of those children alive at birth where intervention was required amounted to abuse.
We cared for children in severe pain, without swallow reflexes, who constantly fitted and other dreadful pain filled conditions.
Under what universe would you condemn a poor child to be born into such a ghastly existence, when you had the ability to abort at a very early stage?
Under what universe would you condemn a poor child to be born into such a ghastly existence, when you had the ability to abort at a very early stage?
These children's conditions were readily known early in the pregnancy were they? I was unaware they routinely tested for swallow reflexes, fitting and cognitive abilities in utero. I would have assumed most of these problems became apparent at birth so I shall have to ask the midwives in my family about these screening programs.
I do agree that just because medical science can doesn't mean it must or necessarily should give every intervention. However in my own extended family there is a child born at 25 weeks for whom every intervention was made and that child is a normal, happy, healthy 4 year old. With hindsight the interventions were correct but who was to know?
In my volunteer role I have contact with many people with Down syndrome, the world would not have been a better place if they had been aborted.