Rula
Two million people live in Gaza. 50 thousand have died. Awful result of war. Innocents suffering.
I believe that the definition of genocide must have changed over the years. Surely Israel would just have bombed Palestine into oblivion. Which it obviously hasn't.
I would have assumed that a genocidal act would not give warnings, evacuation facilitation. I wouldn't have thought a genocidal aggressor would pause bombings for children to be vaccinated.
I've lived in Israel. I was working to assist Palestinians going into Israel for medical treatment. Which was ongoing until October 7th. Which was a genocidal act by Hamas and some civilians.
There is very little understanding amongst contributors on this site. Thank goodness for the few who do understand.
What do you think the original definition of genocide was? How has it changed over the years?
I'm sure you're aware that the term "genocide" was coined in 1943. The Holocaust Memorial Museum's definition is the original.
How can you deny that what Israel is now doing is "deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction, in whole or in part". Over 80% of Gaza's infrastructure has been destroyed. Israel has denied Gazans essential food and medication since the beginning of the war. The sole aim is to clear the area of Palestinians - that's genocide.
The Hamas attack on 7th October was horrendous, but it wasn't genocide. What the Israelis are doing now, especially in the last week, is.

