Galaxy
What are you on about?
Ever so sorry for not including the quotes from old frill . Why she felt the need to open a second thread on this very same subject .
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
Is this common sense at last?
From ‘The Times’ this morning
Organisations will be told that they can no longer call a space single-sex if they admit transgender people who do not have a gender recognition certificate.
Updated guidance from the equality watchdog will say that services described as being single-sex will not be able to make the claim if they also allow transgender women to use them on the basis of self-identification
Last week the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) sent ministers its updated code of practice, which guides organisations on how to apply the Equality Act. It is expected to be presented to parliament before the summer. The Times understands the recommendations include an overhaul of how single-sex spaces are defined.
A source said of the guidelines: “The upshot [of the guidance] means it's not lawful to have a self-ID service. The fact is that if you let a man in, it's no longer a single-sex service, and that includes trans people without GRCs [gender recognition certificates] .”
The change would prevent those who rely on self-ID from being able to access women-only care homes or domestic abuse refuges without an exceptional reason
My question is just why has this taken complicated legislation - and so long?
Galaxy
What are you on about?
Ever so sorry for not including the quotes from old frill . Why she felt the need to open a second thread on this very same subject .
I see no 'hate mongering' on either thread, despite efforts to stir that up by certain posters. Just because someone disagrees with you does not imply 'hate' of any kind.
Syracute
Clearly you are cherry picking for your own sad hate narrative .
Again Galaxy . Sorry for no quotes . This refers to vice versa s comment just above .
Old frill can open as many threads as she wants. I could open 5 on Morris dancing if I felt so inclined.
Syracute
Syracute
Clearly you are cherry picking for your own sad hate narrative .
Again Galaxy . Sorry for no quotes . This refers to vice versa s comment just above .
Again, for the record, I do not 'hate' trans people. I've clearly stated that more than once on these threads. And as for 'cherry picking', are you denying that some - and yes, I do stress that it is some, not all - very vocal, militant trans people have been abusive and threatening on social media following this case? Because it's all there in black and white for anyone who cares to read it.
Syracute
Ridiculous thing to do !
Now it is 2x hate mongering
The hate mongering as you put it Syracute is still being spread by those who are ranting on on social media that the new ruling
won’t stop them going where they want!
or as I posted earlier,
those TW/TRAwho shout that they are going to fight what they call this stupidity to the end and who say,
“If you think a (use your imagination expletive) court can stop us, you’ve got another expletive think coming.”
Now that’s hatred and will continue to damage the cause of all trans as well as harming women.
Syracute I have read through both similar threads and have not seen any hatred or animosity towards transwomen.
Those who have caused the problems for that group and women are the TRAs. They are aggressive and threatening and women have had no option but to fight for their rights.
I believe there are many people like me who will let others get on with their lives whoever they are. It's only when others cause us problems that we have to stand our ground and the TRAs have definitely brought about this court case
These threads are often reminiscent of 'groundhog day'. What are these 'rights' that we're always hearing about? What 'rights' are the trans gender community being denied that the non trans gender community have?
Smileless2012
These threads are often reminiscent of 'groundhog day'. What are these 'rights' that we're always hearing about? What 'rights' are the trans gender community being denied that the non trans gender community have?
The rights of men to be able to prevent women from being alone or with other women? To deny us privacy and dignity and to have anywhere to go that is away from their gaze? To subsume us into a group of 'non-men'? To prevent social scientists from researching the lives of women with a view to equalising our life chances? Is that enough to be going on with?
Yes Doodledog, that’s an excellent start.
Not even the ardent trans supporters on SM seem to be able to come up with a list of trans rights that are being denied that don’t involve taking rights from women.
The most frequent cry is trans right are human rights, with no explanation of what human rights are being denied.
I even asked on GN threads -but without success.
Smileless2012
These threads are often reminiscent of 'groundhog day'. What are these 'rights' that we're always hearing about? What 'rights' are the trans gender community being denied that the non trans gender community have?
I found this article from ITV news which may give some insights - its not from a trans organisation but asking trans women the questions
www.itv.com/news/2025-04-18/how-are-the-trans-community-reacting-to-wednesdays-supreme-court-ruling
To bring it down to ground level and what we have often talked about, (the quiet trans living everyday lives) I tried to put myself in the position of my 72 yr old trans friend who transitioned some time ago and can "pass"and has lived as a women and some of the fears they might face
where can I go to the toilet?
what happens if I have a serious illness and need to go into hospital
what if I am subject to personal body searches
where do I change at the gym
where can I go for refuge if I am affected by domestic violence?
(^please don't shoot the messenger, I'm just trying to raise some points, and as I have made clear, support the ruling^)
I think the sooner the Equalities Commission make detailed guidelines available for organisations the better. Since the ruling has specifically said they will protect trans rights perhaps we can look to them as to specifics.
They campaign for their own spaces or they use the men's. To be honest i think people need to ask why some people told transwomen that they were women, it was a cruel thing to do. But it wasn't the feminists who did it.
Syracute
I wish some of the people here would follow a few transgender folks on social media to gain insight . It’s horrible to demonize this whole subject. Reading some of the comments here I realize how absolutely ignorant most are here and I thank those deeply who give an alternative viewpoint like Glaswee gran .
I quite agree, there is too much reaction and not enough investigation and thoughtfulness in all this... and thank you, glad I am not a lone voice on here.
In answer to the question "where can I go for refuge from domestic violence"
The domestic violence charity Refuge is going to continue with its policy of including trans women.
Nothing has changed there.
As regards hospital. Probably have a private room, but might be too ill, so would be on mixed high dependency, as are women.
Changing at the gym would be down to the gym to decide what facilities to offer, so would depend on which gym to choose to belong to.
Yes, nothings really changed has it, except a clarification that that men can’t now forcibly access spaces and facilities that women have decided are their own.
Why is that such an outrageous concept for transpeople and their supporters.
I don't know about other towns and cities, but here in Manchester the only public lavatories I can think of are at the station. The council closed the others due to austerity and asked that shops, bars and eateries allowed the general public to use theirs, even if they were not customers.
I think it will quickly become apparent which venues will still allow trans people access to their facilities and which will only allow access to those whose biological set matches the single sex facility.
Women and trans will then be able to choose, and Muslim women could feel secure in making a choice.
Syracute
Ridiculous thing to do !
Now it is 2x hate mongering
Is this supposed to be a comment on there being two threads? Neither of which are in any way hate mongering. If any hate mongering was done it was by the trans militants and the SNP government under Sturgeon who accused anyone criticising their policy of being bigots and transphobic. We all have to live together yet she alienated so many moderate, caring, people to suit her political agenda. Don't come here to bicker about threads full of hate, your perception is distorted by your own agenda. I suspect you will call more like you will come, anonymously supporting each other on line with no regard for truth or logic.
Ilovecheese
In answer to the question "where can I go for refuge from domestic violence"
The domestic violence charity Refuge is going to continue with its policy of including trans women.
Nothing has changed there.
And same in Scotland. This is because women's refuges never actually had a problem with transwomen in the first place.
Yes lots of organisations were weak. There are now refuges that cater only for women so women can choose.
And some weren't. Women's Aid clarified their commitment to single sex services a while back. They still provide services for men who identify as trans but also provide single sex services as they understand that some traumatised women need them.
Ilovecheese
In answer to the question "where can I go for refuge from domestic violence"
The domestic violence charity Refuge is going to continue with its policy of including trans women.
Nothing has changed there.
Yes, I noticed that, there is a detailed BBC article about the issues. Refuge have been aware for a long time of the issues but their guidelines are
"Currently all our community based and non-accommodation services are fully accessible to trans women, and our accommodation services are predominantly single-sex
Also in the BBC article it noted one organisation immediately deciding "British Transport Police has been the first body to actually change its policies. It says strip searches of people in custody will be carried out by officers of the same biological sex.
BBC article, read last section
www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c74z04j23pwo
There are also issues around civil partnerships and marriage which currently revolve around having a GRC.
Thank you for the link Wyllow. What's lacking in the content is the acknowledgement of the huge part the TRA's have had to play.
That's the reason why things have changed and the vast majority of trans women who do simply want to get on with their lives, now feel at risk.
The rise in transphobia is IMO down to the appalling behaviour of a very small minority, and supports what we on GN have been saying for years.
Glasweegran
Don't you think it was the lack of thoughtfulness towards women and non-harmful trans which caused the problems in the first place?
It’s fine talking about too much reaction, especially if you include the reaction by TRA to people speaking the truth and defending women’s rights-reactions like death threats and cancelling aimed at innocent people.
Luminance mentioned somewhere about the need for mutual respect.
Where is the respect for women from those TW/TRA who are still stamping their feet and shouting that they won’t take any notice of the ruling.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.