Gransnet forums

News & politics

Will the Supreme Court protect Women's Rights?

(833 Posts)
OldFrill Tue 15-Apr-25 13:48:53

Judgement is due tomorrow Wed 16 April.
The link explains the history, the options and the implications.

sex-matters.org/posts/updates/will-the-supreme-court-protect-womens-rights/

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Thu 17-Apr-25 19:00:28

Love ‘autocarrot’ Doodledog!

Doodledog Thu 17-Apr-25 19:06:36

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Love ‘autocarrot’ Doodledog!

grin

Chocolatelovinggran Thu 17-Apr-25 19:13:12

I have posted before about my affection for my excellent former GP, who was a transwoman, following surgery and hormone therapy.
She continued to live with her wife and children, went to church, and in every way led a totally unassuming life. She was very much a part of the wider life of my small town. This was forty years ago.
She was an excellent ambassador for transgender people.

Smileless2012 Thu 17-Apr-25 19:41:03

She was an excellent ambassador for transgender people she sounds like it Chocolatelovinggran smile.

Transgender need either their own facilities or be able to use those for their sex without fear or trepidation FGT's. Disabled facilities need to be retained for the disabled.

Luminance Thu 17-Apr-25 20:01:17

Thank you for the answers. Do we foresee any issues that might arise? Disabled toilets makes me a little uncomfortable. Could we possibly turn our attention to making public facilities more secure? I have passed many facilities that did not look at all safe and lived with the discomfort.

Chocolatelovinggran Thu 17-Apr-25 20:12:36

The new build shopping centre in my daughter's town in Norway has individual non - gendered toilets opening onto the communal areas. These seem to cover all bases.

Luminance Thu 17-Apr-25 20:15:08

Chocolatelovinggran

The new build shopping centre in my daughter's town in Norway has individual non - gendered toilets opening onto the communal areas. These seem to cover all bases.

Oh how wonderful! So much safer for everyone.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Thu 17-Apr-25 20:41:08

Lloyds Bank …. This is what happens when organisations like Stonewall are allowed to take root in any organisation. Their ideology infests everything and like Japanese knot weed is almost impossible to remove.

fancythat Thu 17-Apr-25 21:00:11

Galaxy

I would never use a female pronoun to describe a man. It is part of why we ended up where we are.

I would and I think have.
It was tricky. There was a group of us, and someone in the group knew the person. So knew their history.

They still very much need to be loved.

Smileless2012 Thu 17-Apr-25 21:00:14

I love the comparison to Japanese knot weed FGT's; spot on.

Mollygo Thu 17-Apr-25 21:05:20

If I’m speaking to a person the only pronoun I’d use is you or I’d use their name.
No one has the right to declare how they must be referred to in their absence.

Keeper1 Thu 17-Apr-25 21:12:25

It wasn’t just women only spaces that have been at stake, women were slowly being sidelined. The very word woman was was being written out we saw that in medical information leaflets putting women at risk. Everything was being done satisfy a very small minority at the expense of women.

Allira Thu 17-Apr-25 21:15:08

Luminance

Thank you for the answers. Do we foresee any issues that might arise? Disabled toilets makes me a little uncomfortable. Could we possibly turn our attention to making public facilities more secure? I have passed many facilities that did not look at all safe and lived with the discomfort.

Disabled toilets are designed for people who are less able and have higher seats, grab rails etc.
There is usually only one separate cubicle.
If they are used by those who are quite able, for other reasons, it means those less able may have to wait which could cause problems.

Doodledog Thu 17-Apr-25 21:23:54

Luminance

Thank you for the answers. Do we foresee any issues that might arise? Disabled toilets makes me a little uncomfortable. Could we possibly turn our attention to making public facilities more secure? I have passed many facilities that did not look at all safe and lived with the discomfort.

Who are 'we', Luminance? Do you mean women? The trouble is that women have already fought for many many years to get facilities of our own, recognition that our lives are often different from those of men, and that there are times when we are vulnerable. We have come close to equality with men under the law, because we fought for it - are we now supposed to choose between giving up what we have achieved and continuing to fight so that men can muscle in?

For a long time we were expected to bunk up when a man wanted to use our spaces because of his feelings, and now it seems that you are asking 'us' to 'turn our attention' to making them more comfortable. Why? That tide seems to have turned, and I, for one, am delighted.

At what point do men take responsibility for their choices? 'Living as a woman' (whatever that means) is definitely a choice if you are a man. A more reasonable approach for someone who is concerned about 'gender' is to work towards making gendered expectations a thing of the past.

Nobody has explained (despite a million threads on the subject) what 'living as a woman' or 'being in the wrong body' actually means, so aligning with 'gender' has to be about preferring to look like or wear or do the things usually expected of women, or men. Those expectations have changed over time, and they differ across cultures - they are absolutely not biological. It used to be considered unfeminine to drink pints or have tattoos, for instance, but (for younger people at least) this is no longer the case. Some religions require women to cover their hair, and others don't - these things are arbitrary and not inherent.

Why not work on just living at letting live? No need to claim to be a woman because you want to wear lipstick or drink Babysham, or to 'transition' to maleness because you are drawn to traditionally male behaviour. Just do it, and let others do their thing, whilst respecting the fact that many women are not comfortable with having men see them naked, or being around them when they are vulnerable.

Luminance Thu 17-Apr-25 21:33:55

Most doctors I work with state that gender dysphoria is likely caused by several potential biological factors. I let myself be guided by that and would prefer to make no assumptions about the motivations of trans people while more research is carried out.

Galaxy Thu 17-Apr-25 21:34:19

I do think there is a level of audacity to saying to women can we all be friends now.
Imagine there was a movement to remove gay rights (well to be fair the trans movement did that too but putting that aside) and gay people fought through the law to retain those rights, then once they had won, some people said but you need to be nice to those people who threatened your rights. Would that happen or is it only women who have to deal with this kind of nonsense.

Luminance Thu 17-Apr-25 21:38:28

I find it rather easy to be nice to nice people as individuals.

ViceVersa Thu 17-Apr-25 21:39:30

Totally agree with you both, Doodledog and Galaxy. And I do find it somewhat ironic that the very vocal trans lobby are always banging on about how everyone should 'be kind' to them in one breadth, while in the next, flinging vile insults and abuse (including in some cases death threats) to 'TERFS'.

Allira Thu 17-Apr-25 21:41:28

Luminance

Most doctors I work with state that gender dysphoria is likely caused by several potential biological factors. I let myself be guided by that and would prefer to make no assumptions about the motivations of trans people while more research is carried out.

Do these doctors work for the NHS?

The NHS protocol states that the causes of gender dysphoria are unclear and many factors are involved.

Doodledog Thu 17-Apr-25 22:24:04

How Virtue Signalling is that?

I also manage to be 'nice' to people, but maybe mu definition of 'nice' differs from yours? Mine involves allowing for difference of opinion and respecting the viewpoints of others.

I find the idea that you work in MH rather difficult to believe, Luminance. None of your posts suggest that you have had any training in accepting that your way is not the only way to think, and you don't seem able to take on board opinions that differ from your own. Even your user name suggests that you feel you are shining a light on the matter for the benefit of those of us who don't understand grin

Again, this all feels depressing familiar.

Anyway. How do you feel about the suggestions I made in my earlier post? Or re you going to continue to post vague accusations and refuse to engage with actual issues, in the manner of posters passim?

Doodledog Thu 17-Apr-25 22:25:27

Sorry - I thought I had quoted the Virtue Signalling post from Luminance above. My post wasn't getting at you, Allira.

Mollygo Thu 17-Apr-25 22:44:03

Virtue Signalling posters, or VS sounds horribly familiar.

Lathyrus3 Thu 17-Apr-25 22:45:06

😬

Doodledog Thu 17-Apr-25 22:53:32

Mollygo

Virtue Signalling posters, or VS sounds horribly familiar.

Really? I'm not sure what you mean.

Galaxy Thu 17-Apr-25 23:04:54

Really interesting statement from Justine at MN about their position during this time. And naming the organisations who pulled their advertising.
Justine was one of the brave women. I think I would rather be brave than 'nice'.