WW2 hopefully they'll self destruct. Radio 4 asked Rupert about the King this morning and he avoided the question! 
I'm superior too but our family surname only goes back to the Norman conquest so if Rupert moves the goalposts, I could be in trouble.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
A new definition of what constitutes British
(65 Posts)Both parents must have been born in the U.K.
(Restore)
Of course to be absolutely certain you would have to trace your ancestors back to black skinned blue eyed Hunter gatherers.
Anyone? If so you may consider yourselves royalty.
This would make hundreds, of not thousands, of forces children, including mine, stateless. What a stupid idea
Our grandson too, Ladyleffieldlover.
Rupert Lowe's proposals make me laugh they sound exactly the sort of thing my late father- in- law would espouse. Personally, I'm happy to be a hybrid, only one of my grandparents was British through and through, by jove!!! who had a traceable line back into parts of England down through the centuries. The others emanated from other places. Our own grandchildren have an Italian maternal grandmother so they too are a blend, I'm happy to say. The latest addition to the family, my husband's first great grandchild, is eligible for 4 passports, through a half British and half Australian mother and an Indian father born and living in New York, they came over in May and very beautiful she is too. It's the way of the world dear Rupert and you should be used to it even if those, like my late father in law imbued in attitudes from a dim and distant past couldn't get their heads round the fact that many don't see marrying or partnering up with someone from overseas, I did in my first marriage, is no longer a barrier.
Well my ancestors go back to the Plantaganets in a direct line but I have a feeling they were more French than British. Bloody foreigners.
To be clear Lowe, is talking about “White Britons.”
In a bad tempered exchange with BBC’s Nick Robinson, he claimed:
It is a fact that, by 2063, white British people will be a minority on current trends. I don’t think anyone disputes that.”
This is how Reform/Restore propaganda is perpetuated.
It is not a fact and many people have disputed it.
If you are having a sense of déjà vu it is because we have been here before.
The report claiming that “fact” was written by none other than … no prizes for guessing … Reform’s Matt Goodwin. His numbers have been widely discredited as AI slop and hallucinations to support the Great Replacement conspiracy theory. We had a long debate about this here just a few months back when he was promoting his book Suicide of a Nation.
www.gransnet.com/forums/news_and_politics/1356753-Matt-Goodwin
I gave some stats and links to ONS data on page 16 of that if anyone is interested.
When he was challenged in a debate on GB News with Andy Twelves, Goodwin claimed the numbers has been verified by world-leading demographers but he couldn’t name them and they are not credited in the book.
Of course, Lowe would promote such a claim but it has no foundation is fact.
Here’s just one of many online articles disputing the claim:
georginasturge.substack.com/p/will-white-british-really-be-a-minority
What worries me about these wild claims is that Reform (Reform/Restore it makes no difference especially when Lowe is suggesting they get together again) is known to be collecting a vast amount of data on people - but about what we don't know.
In a video begging Reform activists to come to Clacton to help with the by-election, Farage said, we need people here to help build up a massive impressive level of data. About what? Surely all he needs to know is whether someone is going to vote for him. What other data is Reform collecting?
The Good Law Project is already prosecuting Reform in the High Court for failing to respond to Subject Access Requests about what data it is holding on people.
From a party which has made no secret of wanting ICE-like squads on the streets, it is very worrying.
It's absurd that anyone thinks like this. Being "superior British" I am acceptable but some of my GCs would no longer be British citizens. I thought Reform were bad but Restore? Heaven help us!
Good grief! I’ve just worked out that of the sixteen of us in my direct family, only six, would be British, by that measure. Of my parents and siblings, five out of six of us would have to leave. My mum could stay, though.
What a piece of absolute nonsense. 🙄
I wonder what KB thinks of Trump’s plan to take away US citizenship from people born there as a result of birth tourism?
It is odd how the right picks what is convenient and ignores other stuff, when it is actually all of a piece with right wing dogma.
Thank you, Graphite - Mr Lowe's claims based on Mr Goodwin's data: now, it makes sense.
I would no more looking to Mr Goodwin as a reliable source of facts than I would have consulted Dr Shipman about my blood pressure, or sought advice about constructing a patio from Mr Fred West.
That’s my children out then, I was born in Pakistan.
nanna8
Well my ancestors go back to the Plantaganets in a direct line but I have a feeling they were more French than British. Bloody foreigners.
You probably have more of a claim to the throne than Charles!!
Perhaps Who Do You Think You Are should make an episode about Rupert Lowe, he might be surprised to find out who his ancestors were.
The other slight possible problem could be that this ruling might reject, I suspect, my GP and my dentist.
I expect that I am not the only GNetter in that situation.
Fear not, everyone, I'm sure that Mr Lowe has thought this through..
Rupert Lowe’s son, Oxford-born Angus Lowe recently married foreign national Yasmin Mezran.
Yasmin is the daughter of a Muslim Libyan father and Italian mother. Her father is Karim Mezran, a Libyan academic and senior fellow at the Washington DC based Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East.
www.atlanticcouncil.org/expert/karim-mezran/
According to Lowe then, if any grandchildren from this union are born in the UK, they are not going to be British despite the rules saying that for anyone born in the UK on or after January 1, 1983:
You are a citizen if at least one parent was a British citizen or legally "settled" in the UK at the time of your birth.
When he prattles on about "wanting his country back", from whom does he mean exactly?
Who Does He Think He Is I wonder?
Whitewavemark2
That’s two superiors then. 😊
Question
If you are not British because your parents were not born in the U.K., but you marry a superior British person, does that mean your offspring are British or not, as you do not have British status?
Anyone think that it is time to disband Restore😄😄😊
If the parallel to the Nurnberg Laws hold, then no children of a British person by a non-British, will be classified as half British, the children's children as some lesser fraction of Britishness, depending on the status of the person the half-British has children with.
The Nazis categorised people as half- one-quarter, three quarter and various other fractions Jewish, Slav, Romani, Maygar, etc. depending on how many of the individual's parents, grand-parents, great-grandparents and great-great grandparents were not Arians.
So start scrutenising your family tree!
Sorry, I seem to have attached my answer to the wrong quotation.
What about my DD’s children born from with the help of a sperm donor from Denmark?
I heard the interview too and could scarcely believe what I was hearing. Rupert Lowe sounded deranged spouting on and on. I really wondered if he knew what he was saying.
I think I must come from superior stock as I am Yorkshire born and bred and we all know that Yorkshire is the best of the counties.Mind I have lived in other parts, ooh could make me loose a few points and I did not marry a Yorkshireman. I can play cricket for the county though .
Wish me luck as you wave me goodbye 🥺
Father was Polish
This would make hundreds, of not thousands, of forces children, including mine, stateless. What a stupid idea
Difficult to say. My son was born in a British Military Hospital in Singapore. The hospital was considered to be British Sovereign Territory. He has both a British birth certificate and a Singaporean birth certificate so in effect he had dual nationality. My daughter was born in an American Military hospital on a large NATO base but the hospital was considered to be soley the territory of the Americans, so who knows where she would belong. She does have a British birth certificate.
And yes, it is indeed a stupid, ill thought through idea.
nanna8
Well my ancestors go back to the Plantaganets in a direct line but I have a feeling they were more French than British. Bloody foreigners.
You probably know this your Royal Highness, but it seems that millions of people with European ancestry are direct descendants of the Plantagenets. While the legitimate, unbroken male royal line ended with the death of Richard III in 1485 countless modern families—including the British royal family and various European aristocrats—inherit Plantagenet blood through female lines and documented cadet or illegitimate branches. 

Timely reminder DAR about how a similar policy panned out in Germany.
Maremia
Timely reminder DAR about how a similar policy panned out in Germany.
Very different political and economic situations.
While it is absolutely right to learn from history, it is rarely as clearcut as this interpretation suggests.
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
