Who knew it was so simple...? 
Weight loss injections/ treatments
Are they supposed to be people who stick to what is in the bible? Or people who do not?
Who knew it was so simple...? 
I'm assuming it's Christian as opposed to christian?
And there must be more to it than just quoting the Bible?
I assume the person wasn't christened/baptised or Confirmed?
More questions than answers!
I dont know the difference between chrisitan and Christian. They are the same?
Adults who become Christian, get christened/baptised after they have become a Christian.
Many of the contributors to the Bible were discarded along the way- a very careful and deliberate choice. And translators over the centuries have deliberately changed the original stories to something totally different. Worse than Chinese whipers.
I've mentioned it before, but I was totally bowled over about 10 years ago when I attended a lecture by a senior Jesuit Bishop here in Switzerland (still lived in the UK at the time) who is a specialist in Hebrew and Hebrew translations. He explained bery clearly how the story of Adam and Eve was never about man and woman in the original text- which is totally unclear about the sex of the two int he story about the apple and temptation- but 2 synonyms for 'man' as in 'human' ... The early Church manipulated texts heavily to discredit and malign women (including Mary Magdalen of course).
I think, no, I believe that one becomes a Christian at one's baptism and particularly in the case of infant baptism, this is confirmed at one's confirmation when one becomes a full or communicant member of the church. (The clue is in the word).
I too resent the appropriation of the term "Christian" by the evgelical end of the spectrum.
BTW Christian, Jesus, Christ, God, Bible are conventionally written with a capital letter.
I personally don't think they're the same. You can be christian without being a church going individual or aligned to CofE/baptist/RC etc.
Or maybe I'm just confused?
"Evangelical" of course.
So, soontobe, by your set of criteria, the Pope and the Orthodox Patriarchs - and all their world-wide followers - are quite clearly not Christians.
This link about the 'misunderstanding' about Adam and Eve (both synonyms for 'man' as in human, neither female or male, is quite long. Feel free not to bother to read it, of course:
Orthodox Catholic Church of the New Age
The Real Meaning of the Story of Adam and Eve
Life before Birth; the human spirit in Paradise
Although they may not practise their religion, most western people today, still call themselves, Christians, which is right and proper, for our religion is based on the story of Jesus Christ. However, that statement is not quite as simple as it sounds, for His story began long before He was born in Bethlehem. We know this, because as St. John tells us 'He was in the Beginning with God' (John 1: 2.) But what exactly does this mean?
Are we being simply told that his earthly ancestry stretches far back in time, as we read in the genealogy of Jesus Christ, where his line is traced back to 'Adam, the son of God'? (Luke 3:38) But even this is no answer! Who is this Adam? Obviously the reference says that he was the "Son of God", but elsewhere in the Bible this title is only used to refer to Christ and Melchizedek. Clearly then, this phrase does not tell the whole story, but it does indicate that Adam was not a "normal" historical man. Adam was a 'son of God', a spiritual being, not simply a part of God's Physical Creation. To confirm that detail we must read Genesis 5: 1-2 which says: "In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created."
We notice straightaway that Adam is both male and female, which means that Adam was not simply the first man - the start of the human race. In some strange way, which we shall seek to explain in due course, Adam was both male and female. Someone may suggest, that that means that "Adam" is a general term, like "Man" and refers to the whole human race – both men and women. It is obviously not referring to the creation of one single specific male human being. Perhaps it is dealing with the spiritual creation of Mankind, not the evolution of his physical body at all! Let us look again at the text: "Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, ... "
This means simply that Adam is both male and female. But this is not the end of the story for in fact most of chapters 2 and 3 of Genesis are about Adam. And if Adam is both male and female, what is "Eve"? We have to explain her too. We also have to consider the fact that both Adam and Eve were originally in Paradise, a spiritual realm, not somewhere on Earth. And we must even say why Eve was said to have been made out of one of Adam's ribs, although modern men and women have an equal number of ribs! All these and other problems can only be solved if we accept that Adam and Eve represent the spiritual nature of every individual, rather than a physical man and woman.
This story is an allegory, and within it there are many hidden truths. It is not a myth and not a parable either.
I dont know anything about Orthodox Patriarchs.
Yes, the Pope is a Christian.
Soutra, I will try and remember my capital letters.
Personally I believe that a person becomes a Christian, in God's eyes at the point of my post at 15.20pm.
Yes, Catholics are Christians. Missed that bit out.
So anyone christened/baptised isn't a Christian at all until they can say those words for themselves
I strongly disagree.
That effectively means my DCs aren't, as both christened but not confirmed and DS who married in a church was committing a sin and the marriage is invalid?
That's preposterous IMO.
Can every individual Christian, or all the very many different Christian denominations (and there are 100s- a lot more than separate Muslim groups) - choose which chapter and verse defines what is a Christian Soon- or is your decision final?
Your DS did not commit a sin, and his marriage is very much valid.
I do think that children or adults have to say the Romans 10v9 words themselves. I dont think that anyone else can do it for them.
I still like christenings though. The parents are bringing their child before God. A lovely thing to do. And the child gets blessed.
granjura - I dont think there is much dispute amongst Christians, if any, as to which chapter and verse.
There's quite a lot of soon-baiting going on here. Everyone surely understands that her statements refer to what she believes and are intended to be descriptive rather than prescriptive.
Who told you that, soontobe? I've never heard anyone say what you did in your post of 15.20.
I'm not soon - baiting, Lilygran. As a Christian yourself, can you confirm what she says in her post of 15.20 please?
Maybe so Lilygran but she's got me thinking!
I'm certainly not doing any soon-baiting but questioning my interpretation of her posts.
I doN't understand that soon. When you are confirmed and made a member of the Methodist Church, you say a bit more than that. And you make promises. The same promises that were made for you on baptism. 
Surely there is a set service?
Oh, is it part of a service? I thought soon meant you just have to sit in your bedroom or wherever and say the words plus the 'sorry for my sins' bit and that's it!
And that's really what I thought - not p-taking at all.
Although I personally don't think you have to say or do anything formally - just behave in a Christian way and you are one.
No. I don't think it is part of the confirmation/membership service. That's why I'm puzzled. Perhaps it's a family thing soon's family does.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.