How was this catastrophe of a clergyman ever considered suitable to be Archbishop of Canterbury?
A few months ago he resigned because of the CofE's failure, at his level, to deal with sexual scandals within the church.
Ysterday, it was reported that he said that the church at his level failed to respond to the many cases of sexual abuse that landed in their inbox because they were overwhelmed by the number.
This despite the knowledge of the rampant nature of sex abuse within the church being well known for years. I am a catholic and for some years our parish priest was a Cof E priest who had changed sides and when I spoke to him about concerns I had about the amount of sexual abuse being revealed in the catholic church, he told me that what was happening in the catholic church was far less than was happening in the church of England!! This was nearly 20 years ago.
Today the papers are reporting that Justin Welby is reported 'forgiving' John Smyth, a man who abused 100 or more young men. Who is Justin Welby to be 'forgiving this man. He was not one of the abused. Only those men abused by Smyth can forgive him.
The phrase about being in a hole and stopping digging occurs to me. It doesn't seem to occur to Justin Welby.
As I said why on earth was this apology for an Arch-bishop of Canterbury ever thought suitable for the position.
Recalled for a further appointment after a routine mammogram


