Gransnet forums

Site stuff

Gransnet or Nannynet?

(112 Posts)
trisher Sat 16-May-15 10:25:17

I recently had a post deleted because it contravened the guidelines, it wasn't obscene, racist or a personal attack. It was a very bad taste joke the subject of which doesn't really matter. There is in British politics a long history of using satire and bad taste to highlight problems and I wonder why Gransnet feel this is unsuitable for the forums? I certainly would make the joke I made on here to my friends. It was posted on a thread with a warning about bad language so not for the fainthearted. Presumably Jonthan Swift's "A Modest Proposal" where he proposes that the Irish should eat their children as a solution to famine would be regarded as unacceptable and deleted. Come on Gransnet, either set up a warning system and make some posts more appropriate to thinking adults, or just accept the satire part of political debate, but please stop acting like Nanny, we are grown ups!

jinglbellsfrocks Tue 19-May-15 11:49:48

God, that was patronising! shock

jinglbellsfrocks Tue 19-May-15 11:50:14

But true.

jinglbellsfrocks Tue 19-May-15 11:51:11

Overthinking it Trisher?

pompa Tue 19-May-15 12:04:32

Sorry Trisha, I was not criticising your viewpoint, my comment was not aimed at any GNer, I was just stating my view of the way the site is moderated and run.
I said earlier that I would be in favour of a rating system.

trisher Tue 19-May-15 12:11:55

Probably jbf

soontobe Tue 19-May-15 12:12:04

Perhaps, or presumably, there is a bad taste rating system already at headquarters.

Riverwalk Tue 19-May-15 12:31:06

I've only twice posted on Mumsnet but I do read with interest some of their threads.

One recent thread could have been libelous IMO - it was jokey and gossipy about various celebrities that members had met/heard about - they named names and made quite serious/salacious allegations.

The law of the land is just that and equally applies to both sites and all sites, so I can only conclude that as certain posts and threads are deleted here on GN but wouldn't raise an eyebrow on MN, that HQ think we are somehow delicate and sensitive.

Just because we are grandparents doesn't mean we have to be protected - it's patronising and ageist.

Anya Tue 19-May-15 12:40:14

Agree riverwalk

I didn't find trisher's post offensive.

Eloethan Tue 19-May-15 13:13:57

I agree with riverwalk also.

thatbags Tue 19-May-15 14:52:18

I also agree with what riverwalk said.

ffinnochio Tue 19-May-15 15:06:30

I agree with riverwalk's comments. Along with being seen as patronising and ageist, I rather think that the reach/targeting to specific demographics has something to do with gnhq's decision making.