I haven't a clue who or what you're talking about - but if the posts referred to are inane and repetitive they are likely to have little influence anyway.
If they contain inaccuracies or opinions dressed up as facts they can be challenged or ignored. Sometimes challenging can be irresistible but perhaps ignoring is more effective.
Re Brexit, it seems that both leavers and remainers claim that the other "side" has been misled. I think we've all been misled, since this country is in such a mess that I don't think staying in the EU or leaving it will in any way resolve all the problems that this government has created.
We have an antiquated, class ridden system which leans heavily towards favouring the powerful and wealthy - like many other countries I suppose. I think powerful people on both sides of the Brexit debate who have had the opportunity to broadcast their opinions are primarily concerned with how staying or leaving will affect their own specific interests. Certain individuals and businesses will benefit from leaving - other will benefit from staying. (As the saying goes "it's an ill wind that blows nobody any good").
Having said that, I think there are many environmental, employment and health and safety protections contained within EU legislation and for that reason I voted to remain. I don't relish the idea of the UK scrabbling around trying to get deals and giving up ordinary .people's rights and protections in order to achieve that aim. And, given the absolute mess in nearly every area of public life and the shambolic EU negotiations under this government, I increasingly doubt if the UK can operate effectively on its own.