Gransnet forums

Site stuff

Rules - Mumsnet & Gransnet discrepancies

(325 Posts)

GNHQ have commented on this thread. Read here.

FannyCornforth Thu 18-Mar-21 01:53:27

Hello
Are Gransnet and Mumsnet the same 'company', and are posting rules the same?
What follows now is what prompted my to ask.

I had three comments deleted on Tuesday due to them 'breaking talk guidelines', more specifically because they were 'gossip and speculation'. I was told to 'bear this is mind before posting'.
(There is no mention of 'gossip and speculation' in the Talk Guidelines).

I was rather surprised, for reasons which shall become clear, and a teeny bit peeved; but took in on the chin and totally accepted it.

However, it later came to mind that I'd actually learnt said 'gossip and speculation' (which isn't allowed) on Mumsnet.

Furthermore, I learnt this 'gossip and speculation' on a very long running MN thread from 2019, which concerned another senior member of the Windsor's alleged affair.

This morning I searched on MN for the name of this second alleged mistress, and her name appears over eighty times in relation to the Royal Family member.

One of the thread titles in which she appears is '(Insert name here) alleged affair' and another is titled 'Why are the UK press silent about Royal Family Member's alleged affair?'

They are very long running threads and are still available. There are many more threads which discuss the issue.

So, to cut a long story short; are talk guidelines the same on both sites, as it appears that they aren't.
I was under the impression that Gransnet and Mumsnet were one and the same.
Please can you shed some light on this?
Thank you very much!

LauraNorder Fri 19-Mar-21 17:18:06

Hang on in there Nell, we want you to stay, you certainly add a bit of interest and variety. It was all getting a bit samey before you arrived.

Urmstongran Fri 19-Mar-21 17:28:36

Hear, hear!
?

PippaZ Fri 19-Mar-21 17:42:12

I'm sorry I didn't get to put this right earlier; I have been out and just seen your post. It wasn't a "mean message" Urmstongran, in the sense that is wasn't mean towards me. It was about how other members were posting; not something I wanted to be involved with.

Interestingly (or not smile) on the groups I am in on Facebook it is deemed polite to let people in the group know that you are PMing them. In one of them, you are expected to ask the person (in the group) if you may. Mind you, it will probably be about buying a sewing/embroidery machine or where someone got a design/pattern from so not something the rest of the group will want or need to know.

FannyCornforth Fri 19-Mar-21 17:44:24

Lucca

I’m honestly a bit confused as to what we are discussing on here ?
Too much reporting ? I’d say there must be if Nell has ended up with a yellow card
Some oversensitive people ? Probably.
Is there gossip and speculation ? Of course !! But I never knew it was banned.

Further to the 'gossip & speculation' reason given, yesterday I received an email signed from GNHQ
(I had not contacted them be email prior to this)
It was very curt, rude even, and said that my comments on the DoE thread were deleted because they were unkind
So first 'rumour & speculation' isn't allowed, now 'unkindness' confusedhmm

Lucca Fri 19-Mar-21 17:49:13

That’s very odd. I don’t know why what you said had to be deleted , I saw that posters objected and called you out on it but it could have stopped there surely?

The whole site will become very anodyne (hope that’s the right word) if we’re not careful!

Doodledog Fri 19-Mar-21 17:53:41

So comments on a topic that is widely discussed on MN are not allowed on GN, because we are an older demographic?

Are we supposed to be more easily offended? Given the scorn poured on 'wokeness' on here, I would have thought that the 'older generation' would be more robust.

Also, since when did people's opinions on anything depend on their age group? I have a mind of my own, and sometimes I agree with both of my children, sometimes one and not the other, and sometimes not with either. The same applies to whether I agree with friends (who are of varying ages) and my husband.

It is very condescending for GN to assume that we are a homogeneous mass, if that is what they are doing. Surely the number of reported threads leading to the deletions they keep making are testament to the fact that we are not?

Riverwalk Fri 19-Mar-21 17:58:47

I'm beginning to dislike the word 'unkind' when uttered by an admonishing adult - it sounds so wimpy & pathetic, rather like poorly tummy.

Lucca Fri 19-Mar-21 18:01:53

Riverwalk

I'm beginning to dislike the word 'unkind' when uttered by an admonishing adult - it sounds so wimpy & pathetic, rather like poorly tummy.

Agree, like the “please be nice “ thing.
I think we may all have some intense verbal jousting but when the chips are down we are supportive, which makes it a shame posters have to be threatened with banning. And indeed banned.

Galaxy Fri 19-Mar-21 18:08:39

I dont think it's to do with age doodledog, there are comments that stay on here that would last 3 seconds on MN so it works the other way round. It's to do with what gets reported.

Doodledog Fri 19-Mar-21 18:10:48

Galaxy

I dont think it's to do with age doodledog, there are comments that stay on here that would last 3 seconds on MN so it works the other way round. It's to do with what gets reported.

Ah, that makes more sense.

I wonder why that is? If the rules are the same, surely a report of a post that is deemed non-offensive on one board should the deemed the same on the other.

Jaxjacky Fri 19-Mar-21 18:18:27

Doodledog maybe different admin monitor MN from GN?

FannyCornforth Fri 19-Mar-21 18:27:49

Hi all
I really, really didn't want to keep commenting on this, or indeed posting (NB not a flounce)
I honestly think that Galaxy is closest to the mark.
It's all about the reporting
My comments were deleted because they were reported (for whatever reason, what I said was incredibly tame compared to the M&H stuff)
and then a reason for their deletion had to be cobbled together
Hence the rude email from 'GNHQ' yesterday
NB prior to all of this, employees of HQ have been very nice, friendly and polite to me

NellG Fri 19-Mar-21 18:51:19

The GNHQ post up thread says it's a post moderated site - so only the posts that are reported will be looked at. They also said they look at the thread and the context.

So it is dependent on both reporting and the interpretation of the person dealing with it at HQ? If their own guidelines are as vague as the ones we are supposed to follow it must be a difficult job and will always be somewhat arbitrary. Consequently it looks like posts stay or go according to the interpretation of people who only see a section, and don't always know all of the history. The only two ways 'we' can have any degree of influence over that is to report nothing, or report everything. The latter puts trust into something that's not looking massively consistent or reliable so far.

Iam64 Fri 19-Mar-21 18:57:50

I know we aren’t allowed to raise the posters who used to be regulars, you know, the widow with the large dog, just as an example. She was banned after what many of us saw as a concerted attempt to goad a response, which was then immediately reported by the
I expect a this may be my first deleted post.

FannyCornforth Fri 19-Mar-21 19:03:35

Iam64 don't worry, no posts on here so far have been deleted
I'm rather hoping that my boring title is keeping us under the radar of the 'reporters'

JaneJudge Fri 19-Mar-21 19:09:14

Fanny you were not unkind at all, bloody hell x
Please stay so we can have a black country poetry segment or even just regional dialect in literary, it's interesting. We could invite Frank...smile

NellG Fri 19-Mar-21 19:19:54

A few at the beginning were deleted, but I think HQ have more than half an eye on this thread so they may not have been reported.

Galaxy Fri 19-Mar-21 20:16:21

It's probably a bit worrying that my main expertise in life is an analysis of MN and GN smile

Callistemon Fri 19-Mar-21 22:07:21

Iam64 don't worry, no posts on here so far have been deleted

There were some posts deleted earlier on.
I had one deleted as it was a post in defence of a banned poster and my post was not an attack on anyone. It wasn't clear in another deleted post to whom they were referring.

However, although GNHQ were very nice about the reason, it still said my post was against guidelines.
It could be that we are not supposed to refer to absent posters by name.

I expect this one will be deleted if it gets reported.
?

Callistemon Fri 19-Mar-21 22:08:59

Galaxy

It's probably a bit worrying that my main expertise in life is an analysis of MN and GN smile

Is this part of a PhD thesis?
?

JaneJudge Fri 19-Mar-21 22:09:19

if we all start posting in regional dialect it will confuse them....
yaou woe see me no moower

Lucca Fri 19-Mar-21 22:47:55

Iam64. Yes it was so.

Callistemon Fri 19-Mar-21 22:58:23

JaneJudge

if we all start posting in regional dialect it will confuse them....
yaou woe see me no moower

Yer munna do tha me owd duck
Ow bist?

JaneJudge Sat 20-Mar-21 10:05:38

grin grin