fancythat
JackyB
As this is a TAAT (thread about a thread) it shouldn't have been allowed to gather momentum and not so long ago such threads were deleted post haste.
Perhaps GN policy has changed.
It was not started as a TAAT but about site etiquette, about consideration of an OP especially in a sensitive situation and the good manners to know or maybe find out what the situation is before pronouncing publicly and posting.
Yes, it was prompted by the fact that three or more posters had shown themselves to be unaware of a particular situation - which would have been perfectly apparent if they had gone back a very few posts (and the colour of the posts would have been irrelevant anyway)
No, some did not apologise and two of the posts were removed by HQ who said they would have a word with the posters in question so anybody joining the thread since will not necessarily be aware of the content.
Nothing horrible or unkind was said, just well intentioned “good advice” on remaining positive, enjoying time together etc etc but unfortunately posted after the event.
Harmless but potentially hurtful. I know I might have been blindsided if I had logged on to GN the day of my DH’s funeral and read this sort of thing.
Not that this sort of faux pas doesn’t happen in RL, a friend in the village met me out with the dog a few days after DH died, said she had seen the ambulance outside the house and enquired cheerfully if everything was OK?
I did my best to let her down lightly but I felt sorry for her obvious embarrassment. These things happen, but how much better to know the score before putting one’s foot in it.
So the thread moved on to other areas, to unnecessary repetition, to not seeing that a thread might be several years old or that a problem had long since been addressed.
That’s all.