Sky reports on migrant crossings

Maremia

So much has changed since 1995, fancythat. And will continue to change. How do you stop people fleeing from war zones?

Many of the countries that people are leaving are NOT war zones.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 - You might be interested to check out the YouTube channel from "Black belt Barrister". Yep he is a barrister - in England and Wales. He's had several videos on this topic and one of 2 weeks ago entitled "How many will it take?".

Any time I catch someone implying that anyone with this viewpoint is not that bright - I instantly start thinking of channels like this (without getting into the list of jobs apparently suitable personally). I think anyone would recognise to get to be a barrister = he's not daft. Add if one watches it very often - he refers to his wife (and that she isn't British). So someone who is provably intelligent and provably isn't racist and he does make some useful points sometimes.

Yes, we know that, and there is a commitment for deportation which cant happen overnight.

But I really thought it was a about time in my post and picture for a reminder of why we have a proud history of asylum and it is very much needed.

CariadAgain

FriedGreenTomatoes2 - You might be interested to check out the YouTube channel from "Black belt Barrister". Yep he is a barrister - in England and Wales. He's had several videos on this topic and one of 2 weeks ago entitled "How many will it take?".

Any time I catch someone implying that anyone with this viewpoint is not that bright - I instantly start thinking of channels like this (without getting into the list of jobs apparently suitable personally). I think anyone would recognise to get to be a barrister = he's not daft. Add if one watches it very often - he refers to his wife (and that she isn't British). So someone who is provably intelligent and provably isn't racist and he does make some useful points sometimes.

Just watched a couple of his videos. thanks for the link.

Regarding his wife not being British etc - I watched a wide range of people being interviewed on the streets of Leicester, which we all know is one of the most multicultural cities in the UK.

There were Asians, West Indians, Polish, Lithuanians and several other nationalities and every one of them said the brakes should be put on people arriving on rubber dinghies. So it’s a misconception that only white British people want this sorted out and certain people can call them racists.

My best friend is from Tanzania and she is 100% against people arriving here illegally. She did things properly about 20 years ago and followed every rule as did all the people above, who I mentioned.

Actually racist isn't only a term for white british people - it's about the views not the ethnicity. So someone of pakistani descent or afro-caribean descent, for example,can hold racist views ( in the same way that they can be antisemitic) & if they do it is correct to refer to them as racist.

CariadAgain

FriedGreenTomatoes2 - You might be interested to check out the YouTube channel from "Black belt Barrister". Yep he is a barrister - in England and Wales. He's had several videos on this topic and one of 2 weeks ago entitled "How many will it take?".

Any time I catch someone implying that anyone with this viewpoint is not that bright - I instantly start thinking of channels like this (without getting into the list of jobs apparently suitable personally). I think anyone would recognise to get to be a barrister = he's not daft. Add if one watches it very often - he refers to his wife (and that she isn't British). So someone who is provably intelligent and provably isn't racist and he does make some useful points sometimes.

I'm also a fan of Daniel, valid opinions from a point of law, does an excellent job of informing that which escapes many.

Thanks CariadAgain I’ll take a look tomorrow. 😊

Yes Wyllow3 of course we need to be compassionate for those who arrive seeking asylum for genuine needs. I have no problem with that. You’d have to have a heart of stone to disagree with such applications.

That reference you quoted was 10+ years ago now though.
Assad has done a runner after shi****g on his own people.

We are a kind and tolerant nation.
But as France says “we are too soft”.

Rubber boats arrive daily.
Surely we are not so naive that we suppose these irregular migrants are ALL from war torn countries.?

I’m not so green as I’m cabbage looking. Others neither I suspect.

Skydancer

FriedGreenTomatoes2

858 channel migrants over just 2 days of Christmas.

At £400 each per day they will cost us:
£400 x 858 x 365 days = £125 million per annum.

This is untenable
And unacceptable to the British taxpayer.

“Smash the gangs” eh?

When and how are the gangs to be smashed? Before long this country will be totally different to the one most of us grew up in.

How do you think the uk, the Dutch and the French captured over 700 suspects involved in drugs, money laundering, guns, people trafficking in July 2020.
Intelligence, intelligence, intelligence. Which is what is happening as you read this post. And risking their lives.

How do you think the uk, the Dutch and the French captured over 700 suspects involved in drugs, money laundering, guns, people trafficking in July 2020

Admirable in its own way petra but that was 4+ years ago.
Covid was rife (no vaccinations even).
Lockdowns were only just loosening a little.
I imagine security therefore was a tad easier to uncover passages of people.

Look at this week’s movement of irregular migrants and weep.
Over 1,300 this week alone to the UK.

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Yes Wyllow3 of course we need to be compassionate for those who arrive seeking asylum for genuine needs. I have no problem with that. You’d have to have a heart of stone to disagree with such applications.

That reference you quoted was 10+ years ago now though.
Assad has done a runner after shi****g on his own people.

We are a kind and tolerant nation.
But as France says “we are too soft”.

Rubber boats arrive daily.
Surely we are not so naive that we suppose these irregular migrants are ALL from war torn countries.?

I’m not so green as I’m cabbage looking. Others neither I suspect.

FGT, the torture continued year on year until Assad was deposed on December 8th just weeks ago just as in the example.

Times newspaper reported just 3 hours ago this included many children

Extrajudicial Killings
SNHR documented the killing of at least 202,000 civilians at the hands of Bashar Assad’s regime forces, including 23,058 children and 12,010 women.

Enforced Disappearance
At least 96,321 cases of enforced disappearance at the hands of Bashar Assad’s regime forces are documented on SNHR’s database, among them 2,329 children and 5,742 women.

Deaths due to torture
At least 15,102 individuals died under torture at the hands of Bashar Assad’s regime forces, including 190 children and 95 women.

Use of four types of destructive weapons
Barrel bombs
From July 2012, the Bashar Assad’s regime’s air force dropped at least 81,916 barrel bombs, resulting in the deaths of 11,087 civilians, including 1,821 children and 1,780 women.
Chemical weapons
SNHR documented 217 chemical weapons attacks by Bashar Assad’s regime. The first attack was carried out in Homs’s al-Bayyada neighborhood on December 23, 2012. These attacks killed 1,514 individuals, 1,413 of whom were civilians, including 214 children, and 262 women, in addition to injuring 11,080 others.
Cluster munitions
SNHR documented 252 cluster munition attacks by Bashar Assad’s regime forces from their first use of these weapons in July 2012. These attacks resulted in the deaths of 835 individuals, including 337 children and 191 women.
Incendiary weapons
SNHR recorded at least 51 incendiary attacks on civilian areas from March 2011.

snhr.org/blog/2024/12/20/summary-of-the-assad-regimes-crimes-against-the-syrian-people-over-the-last-14-years/

Is it surprising that we have had large numbers of Syrians on the boats?

Jeanathome

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Yes Wyllow3 of course we need to be compassionate for those who arrive seeking asylum for genuine needs. I have no problem with that. You’d have to have a heart of stone to disagree with such applications.

That reference you quoted was 10+ years ago now though.
Assad has done a runner after shi****g on his own people.

We are a kind and tolerant nation.
But as France says “we are too soft”.

Rubber boats arrive daily.
Surely we are not so naive that we suppose these irregular migrants are ALL from war torn countries.?

I’m not so green as I’m cabbage looking. Others neither I suspect.

I'm not green either. You are an absolute disgrace pedaling this vile racist narrative.
If you can say this stuff on a public forum I shudder to think what is going on in the background.

You are an absolute disgrace for your disgusting post to FGT who is NOT pedalling anything of the sort! I have seen unpleasant posts of yours on many threads.

So long as this country sells arms that prolong warfare and destroy people’s homelands we are in no position to cavil at receiving refugees, nor to refer to them as ‘so-called’.

Whoa! Jean@home. Steady on girl.
I’m not going to report your post. I’d rather let it stand as I think it says more about you than me to be honest.

winterwhite

So long as this country sells arms that prolong warfare and destroy people’s homelands we are in no position to cavil at receiving refugees, nor to refer to them as ‘so-called’.

Added to the above we have the EU exporting 10,000 tonnes of Bee killing insecticides a year to poorer countries because this poison is banned in the EU.
Kill the Bees and you threaten millions of people’s livelihoods.
Then what are they going to do 🤷‍♀️ Leave their homes/ countries for somewhere where they can earn a living.

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Whoa! Jean@home. Steady on girl.
I’m not going to report your post. I’d rather let it stand as I think it says more about you than me to be honest.

You are quite right, it does say more about Jean@home

Jeanathome

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Yes Wyllow3 of course we need to be compassionate for those who arrive seeking asylum for genuine needs. I have no problem with that. You’d have to have a heart of stone to disagree with such applications.

That reference you quoted was 10+ years ago now though.
Assad has done a runner after shi****g on his own people.

We are a kind and tolerant nation.
But as France says “we are too soft”.

Rubber boats arrive daily.
Surely we are not so naive that we suppose these irregular migrants are ALL from war torn countries.?

I’m not so green as I’m cabbage looking. Others neither I suspect.

I'm not green either. You are an absolute disgrace pedaling this vile racist narrative.
If you can say this stuff on a public forum I shudder to think what is going on in the background.

Jeanathome that is probably the most disgusting post I have ever read on GN. FGT2 is always very particular in how she phrases her comments and I don’t consider a word of it that makes her a “vile racist.”

I want to report it too but won’t because it just shows you up for what you are, as the others say.

Yes, I agree. Looking for a fight. Maybe should stay @home?

Primrose53

CariadAgain

FriedGreenTomatoes2 - You might be interested to check out the YouTube channel from "Black belt Barrister". Yep he is a barrister - in England and Wales. He's had several videos on this topic and one of 2 weeks ago entitled "How many will it take?".

Any time I catch someone implying that anyone with this viewpoint is not that bright - I instantly start thinking of channels like this (without getting into the list of jobs apparently suitable personally). I think anyone would recognise to get to be a barrister = he's not daft. Add if one watches it very often - he refers to his wife (and that she isn't British). So someone who is provably intelligent and provably isn't racist and he does make some useful points sometimes.

Just watched a couple of his videos. thanks for the link.

Regarding his wife not being British etc - I watched a wide range of people being interviewed on the streets of Leicester, which we all know is one of the most multicultural cities in the UK.

There were Asians, West Indians, Polish, Lithuanians and several other nationalities and every one of them said the brakes should be put on people arriving on rubber dinghies. So it’s a misconception that only white British people want this sorted out and certain people can call them racists.

My best friend is from Tanzania and she is 100% against people arriving here illegally. She did things properly about 20 years ago and followed every rule as did all the people above, who I mentioned.

I've gathered that as well - ie that many legal migrants are just as anti the "boats" coming over. It's one thing if people are doing things properly/the official way and trying to integrate. Where I live now - even though it's vast vast majority British people here - a lot of the people I am friendly with here are some other nationality (as that's just what the area is like - ie small town in West Wales and, as a half-British friend I have said "Most people local to here have relatives here and went to school with each other"). So most of us who aren't "locals" often tend to get together with each other (because we don't have relatives here and/or didn't go to school here).

One of the most vociferous YouTubers against all this is Magyar Tousi (an Iranian engaged to a British woman - who describes himself as British - because he has a British passport) and boy does he word things strongly...

Misspelling - he's Mahyar Tousi

Goodness me!
I’m glad I didn’t visit GN yesterday.