Gransnet forums

TV, radio, film, Arts

Lynley

(82 Posts)
JamesandJon33 Wed 07-Jan-26 14:11:53

We watched this ‘new’ version last night, and were decidedly underwhelmed.
Anyone else have thoughts on it?

Susan56 Wed 07-Jan-26 14:12:31

We quite enjoyed it!

GrannyGravy13 Wed 07-Jan-26 14:32:10

Easy viewing, hopefully the new Lynley will grow into the part.

I loved Nathaniel Parker and Sharon(Susan) Small as Havers in the 2001 version.

wendyann23 Wed 07-Jan-26 15:01:37

I enjoyed it, thought the actor playing Lynley was a good fit for the part. However, Barbara Havers bore little resemblance to the character in the books. Far too pretty and wore decent clothes. But if you ignore the books she may well grow into the part.

Witzend Wed 07-Jan-26 15:16:18

GrannyGravy13

Easy viewing, hopefully the new Lynley will grow into the part.

I loved Nathaniel Parker and Sharon(Susan) Small as Havers in the 2001 version.

I liked him well enough, but couldn’t stand her!
I know it was in the character, but IMO she very much overdid her ‘common’ accent.

Franbern Wed 07-Jan-26 16:28:58

I was totally confused!!! I watch all my tv on recorded programmes, so when I saw it was a 'Lynley' I just expected it to be the characters I have always known. Had no idea they had remade this with new actors. Even backgrounds seem different. Havers, in original one was a Londoner (went to Ealing College), and her Dad was dead and her Mother causing her worries with increased dementia. New Havers, (much smarter in her appearance) is from Norfolk, with a dead Mum and a drunken father.
Wonder if Helen is going to appear in this new series? Her death in the original series was (for me) one of the harrowing scenes on tv drama. So unexpected.

teabagwoman Wed 07-Jan-26 16:53:12

Watched the first episode, very underwhelmed, won’t be bothering to watch again.

notgran Wed 07-Jan-26 16:57:35

I have just binge watched it and did enjoy it. I had totally forgotten the Nathaniel Parker one, until I read this discussion. I simply watched the programe at face value and thought it rather good.

Allira Wed 07-Jan-26 17:25:03

The new Lynley is ok but just doesn't have the presence required for the part; Nathaniel Parker was so good, perhaps no-one could compare.

It was fairly enjoyable but nowhere near as good as the original.

Debbi58 Wed 07-Jan-26 17:53:47

He's a bit gorgeous though isn't he , I'll definitely be watching

ayse Wed 07-Jan-26 17:57:48

I just enjoyed it.

Charleygirl5 Wed 07-Jan-26 18:01:04

It was watchable, but I didn't like the new Havers, totally different.

Franbern Wed 07-Jan-26 18:16:12

It is even more confusing as one of the channels is currently showing episodes from the original Inspector Lynley Mysteries.

eddiecat78 Wed 07-Jan-26 18:22:41

Debbi58

He's a bit gorgeous though isn't he , I'll definitely be watching

Absolutely! Couldn't take my eyes off him.

Greyduster Wed 07-Jan-26 18:45:36

The actors in the original series were a better “fit”. I don’t like the Daniel Mays character in the sub plot either, but I’ll stick with it, if only because the real star of the show for me is the gorgeous car!

Cold Wed 07-Jan-26 18:59:16

I quite like it and hope they make a second series. Although I wonder whether his fantastic house will be underwater soon given the erosion on that coast .....

However I also very much liked the Nathaniel Parker/Sharon Small series

Interestingly I haven't liked either portrayals of (Lady) Helen Clyde

I think that they trying to make it more accessible and believable to modern audiences just as the early 2000s series changed a lot from the books to make it less aristocratic. While they kept Thomas Lynley, as 8th Earl of Asherton, they toned down his aristocratic friends running forensics.

JamesandJon33 Wed 07-Jan-26 20:21:19

I remember reading ‘ What came before he shot her , ‘ a really disturbing book.

Jane43 Wed 07-Jan-26 20:27:30

It seemed to me to be an imitation of Endeavour which I found wonderful so I didn’t bother to watch it.

Aveline Wed 07-Jan-26 21:08:58

I gave up on it. It was boring and I didn't care about any of the characters. I much preferred the original casting. Barbara Havers then was much more convincing.

DamaskRose Wed 07-Jan-26 21:15:26

It was ok but not a patch on the original.

Sheebee1 Thu 08-Jan-26 01:09:11

Lead character doesn’t close his mouth, I’ve noticed one of the Shetland leads does this, mouth breathers…havers doesn’t seem to relax - too stiff and wooden actors. The storylines are good though.

Wyllow3 Thu 08-Jan-26 01:23:07

Love it to bits. I'm not worried about what came before, or the books I've watched two - the second one was the better of the two, good plots, liked the characterisation, yes eye candy.

Yes, it's a bit "popularised" but great light viewing imo.

Chocolatelovinggran Thu 08-Jan-26 08:28:31

I agree that the actor cast as Barbara Havers is completely wrong . She bears no resemblance to the character in the book.

Samsara1 Thu 08-Jan-26 10:19:08

I loved it because I have been treated to an everlasting orgy of spies, terrorists and Special services ops including shooting, knifing, garroting and throat cutting. I enjoy the drams but I suddenly felt very nauseas in the second episode of the Night Manager so Lynley was a pleasant evenings viewing. DH hated it - too slow he said.

Chestnut Thu 08-Jan-26 10:42:38

I'm always looking for a good drama series without violence, gore, swearing etc. but there are far too many detective duos with a male/female odd couple. And the re-hashing of the same characters is just as bad. So I'm not into it I'm afraid. I'm looking for original drama which is character-driven rather than people solving endless murders.

I think we also have to accept that there is rarely any link to the original version of anything these days. Even Dickens has been torn up and re-written (Great Expectations BBC 2023). You have to accept what you see on the screen which is difficult if you've read the book.