Gransnet forums

Site stuff

Arguments attract aggressors.

(80 Posts)
Elegran Sun 03-May-15 10:59:07

I wonder if anyone else has the impression that a good ding-dong on a thread seems very often to attract swarms of spammers and inspires trouble-makers to start up new threads on controversial and divisive subjects and keep stoking them?

Most of the time the forum goes along as usual, lots of conversations and exchanges, mostly goodnatured chat or reasoned debate with the occasional raised voice. Sometimes a more heated debate gets going, where more people join in. After that, there is a rash of angry threads which seem to come from nowhere, started by people I have never heard of before, and lots of posts wanting us to go to someone's website and presumably spend money there.

I assume they see the arguments on a search engine, and think "Is this a private fight or can anyone join in?" so they join set GN and set up their boxing ring (or their market stall on the edge of the bare-knuckle bout)

I don't include here the anger in some threads from established posters - they are not the opportunist hitchhikers I am talking about.

jinglbellsfrocks Sun 03-May-15 18:01:46

What would you put in Google? "Forum bun fights"? Would that do it? confused

janeainsworth Sun 03-May-15 18:14:29

Jingl Apparently 'CycleChat' has a dedicated bun-fight forum.
Perhaps we should ask GNHQ for one smile
www.cyclechat.net/threads/bun-fight-forum.8586/

janeainsworth Sun 03-May-15 18:18:10

Here's an idea from one of the CycleChatterers:

"When a thread gets "bunfighted" (bunfought?) it is possible for the hijackers/bunfighters to carry on contributing. What I think should happen, if technically possible, is that all the contributions of a hijacker or bunfighters should be hived off into a bunfight version of the thread and they should then be blocked from further contributing to the original version of the thread.

I suspect though that the software might not be sophisticated enough to implement that."

petallus Sun 03-May-15 18:26:14

The problem with that idea is who gets to decide when to chuck someone off the thread for bunfighting? I predict chaos.

I know of a forum where they have a 'hell' section for no-holds barred postings. If you go on that you know what to expect.

rosequartz Sun 03-May-15 19:29:52

shock it's a scary world out there that I didn't know existed!

What did these people do before the www - go around shouting at everyone or suppressing their hatred and angst?

Ana Sun 03-May-15 19:33:06

Perhaps they wrote letters in green ink to their local newspapers?

Ariadne Sun 03-May-15 19:40:07

Oh, I am so sorry! And it was stupidly trivial of me to mention it anyway. in the great scheme of things, all this doesn't really matter blush

Ana Sun 03-May-15 19:45:17

You're right Ariadne, there are far more important things...sad

Nelliemoser Sun 03-May-15 19:53:00

What I cannot understand is how some posters seem to find it it impossible to walk away.
Many of these threads reach a point where anything that can be said about an issue has been said.

At which point it is time to go home, or have some harmless fun hacking GNHQs stash of emoticons. dragon daffodil crown moon sunshine

and those with the complicated codes. We need a Dove of peace.

petallus Sun 03-May-15 20:04:29

But you haven't walked away Nelliemoser grin

jinglbellsfrocks Sun 03-May-15 20:04:43

shock I think you are gonna be in BIG trouble when they see you've been raiding their emoti stash! shock

It's not me. I didn't do it. [halo]

Ana Sun 03-May-15 20:07:23

Oh, they must have noticed by now! Anyway, it's not our fault, someone in the tech department must have forgotten to lock the cupboard...thlwink

Ariadne Sun 03-May-15 20:09:05

smile

jinglbellsfrocks Sun 03-May-15 20:09:30

If only we could find a way to put a moving, or a flashing one, up. That would get 'em worried. grin

Ana Sun 03-May-15 20:11:28

Don't mention flashing...tchshock

jinglbellsfrocks Sun 03-May-15 20:13:57

grin you are in such trouble.

rosesarered Sun 03-May-15 20:17:24

True, Ana, and now we are in there is no stopping us!crown daffodil
dragon shamrock
I must admit I have not seen these new posters Elegran, but don't always bother to trawl through long threads.

rosequartz Sun 03-May-15 20:22:17

Luk out fer badd speling roseserredd that is orlways an indikayshen of a newcummer.

[tbhgrin]

Ana Sun 03-May-15 20:22:29

I hope they don't confiscate our biscuit biscuit biscuit

That would be mean!

rosequartz Sun 03-May-15 20:23:11

And peeple who cant get the emoticonns

rosesarered Sun 03-May-15 20:25:04

That would be YOU then Rosequartz!grin

rosequartz Sun 03-May-15 20:32:56

I can do this one though
grin

magpie123 Mon 04-May-15 17:21:11

Anya well said. Sad lives that all I can think of.

Elegran Mon 04-May-15 17:41:32

Anya didn't get any full fury though, magpie so we are perhaps not as sad as you thought. In fact, there seems to be quite a lot of humour and tolerance on this thread. There usually is unless someone intolerant or agressive comes along with their two-pennorth.

loopylou Mon 04-May-15 17:46:52

You aren't the only one who's emoticon-bereft rosequartz sad, I guess I haven't been around long enough or am too IT-clueless to grasp the basics! If they don't appear in the list at the bottom then that's that!