And being taken out and getting 7 o levels perhaps you would have got 9 if you hadn't Ddeeda
Are White British Men somehow “disadvantaged”
Could someone tell me what happened to the post ...
My daughter is paying £120 to take her 5 yr old son out of school for a holiday to Orlando. Another parent at the same school is also taking her two children out of school (same reason) but has confided in a "friend" that she is going to say that they are ill. What does anyone think of this?
And being taken out and getting 7 o levels perhaps you would have got 9 if you hadn't Ddeeda
Or twelve O levels as my DC did. Ducks behind the parapet 
To go back to OP ;)
You can't just 'pay £120 to get child out of school' - there may well be other consequences- including possible social services getting involved, and possibly a place a the school for younger sibblings, etc.
As for lying about being ill- I'm quite sure the school will insist on a medical certificate when they see the children and parents dropping them off, with a great suntan- and the kids full of beans talking about Mickey and co. Surely!?
Again, there may well be other consequences, as in above- and probably forget about other sibblings attending the school is places are short, or getting a place on the over-subscribed trip, etc, etc. + loss of respect and goodwill.
Never mind the consequences of a child getting in the habit of lying and then saying 'but you told me to mum and dad- and you did to...'
In my day the Grammar School I attended would never have put any of us in for 12 O levels - there just wasn't time on the curriculum. It's different these days with 'modules' etc which can be taken at any time.
All our exams had to be taken in a single go (unless the O level in question included both a practical and a theory exam, of course).
I find it all quite confusing
paying £120 - well, it is actually a fine, not paying for time off
and as for lying, well that is not right either.
I think some authorities are more draconian than others, however.
Mine was the same, Ana, eight was our maximum. My DS was astounded - "What, you only got 8 O-levels?". No, actually I only got 7. I never did get on with Biology 
Too much smugness on this thread for my liking.
Private school with longer school day, all high achievers sat 12 O levels and 4 or 5 A levels.
What, even in the 60s? Well, good for them...
Actually, holiday companies claim that it is not a case of holidays being more expensive during school holiday time, that is the standard rate. The cheaper rates during term time are discounted. Or so they claim, but quite how this ties in with the different prices charged for holidays leaving Scottish airports in July when the English schools are still in term time......? I wonder how all those parents who think it acceptable to take their children out of school during term time claiming it is educational/necessary due to parental shifts/a bonding experience/etc., would feel if their child's class teacher announced they were having a week off and the children would just have to make some pretty drawings or keep a diary during the teacher's absence? Remember, teachers too have to take their holidays during the expensive holiday times and they may not have children. Not for them the option of skipping off a few days before the end of term 'to get ahead of the crowds'.
Well, yes, but they know that from the start- par for the course.
When we had school age kids, we got first pickings on the dates during Summer hols, but 2 weeks max as there were other partners with school age children. We got 1 Easter and 1 Bank Hol out of 5 ... and we only were able to take 1 week for Christmas once in the whole of the 40 years of DH's career.
When kids left school- we were in an impossible situation. Me stuck with school holidays, and DH not able to take any time off during that time. After 2 years we came to the only possible conclusion- if we wanted to have any time together and at last do a bit of travelling - then I would have to give up the job I loved.
I started my own language school hosting foreing students and adults (6 teenagers at a time- great fun, but exhausting, don't quite know how I did it...) during school hols and on demand throughout the year. I loved it, but so missed my 6th Formers and colleagues- but it was the price to pay.
In a couple of days my two grandson aged 6 and 3 are being taken out of their private school to go on holiday (in a camper van to Cornwall) for a week.
The reason they're being taken out of school? Because their military dad is going on an extended tour of duty soon afterwards and they want to create some memories. The school has given full support.
When our kids were at school, a long time ago now, these fines didn`t exist, and parents were allowed to keep a child off school for a maximum of 2 weeks a year, but it was a necessity to inform the school head several months in advance. We didn`t have expensive holidays, never took them abroad, we had self catering holidays in the UK, but as our work holidays were staggered and we rarely managed for both of us to book holidays for school holiday time, we did take advantage of the system, and I don`t think their education suffered overmuch.
DH was a teacher so we had no choice but to go away in usual school hols-for years we went camping in France meeting up with my school penfriend and family so it was great bi-lingual fun.
DD1 is self employed with her husband and taking time off is v difficult-finding locums etc. Last year she wanted/needed a week's break to where we usually try to go as a family each year but it meant the 5 and 6 years old having half a week off-usually managed last week in August before return but couldn't that year.
They applied for time off. The children have excellent attendance records and are both hard workers. Time off was granted with no problems. Apart from reading books and keeping up with writing and 'rithmetic no extra work was asked for or needed.
Their "older batch" of children then aged 15/17 had finished exams and the only thing going on at school was "activities week"-what a joke and waste of time, just outings to local theme parks etc so nothing lost there and saved a fortune which went towards the cost of the holiday!
grannyactivist- of course, the school can still make exceptions in exceptional circumstances like those, thank goodness. A friend of daughter took both girls out for a holiday when she was confirmed terminally ill- before she got worse. Of course, humanity has to prevail- and all the teachers do bend over backwards to help and support, catch up, etc, in their own time, and with pleasure.
Granny activist a perfectly understandable and totally reasonable occasion.
we used to take our 3 for a week or 2 every year, by the age od 12 they were conversant with other cultures, could order their drinks & food in Greek & by the time thy had left school all but one had been to all the major Greek archaeological sites and quite a few minor ones plus a numb er of museums. This way they got an education that wan't part of the National Curriculum.
As a teacher, there was obviously no question of taking the family away in school time. We ere fortunate to have grandparents living at the coast so "bucket and spade" hols and days out in the school holidays including museum trips, castles etc kept everyone happy. Less sophisticated days I guess!!
I agree with Jalima, it is nothing to do with money in some cases, but being able to get holidays from work during school holidays. My OH and I both worked in social care and it was extremely difficult to get holidays together, never mind when kids were off. We didn't go abroad when the kids were young, we went on caravan holidays in Scotland so the girls learned about nature and their heritage. The head at our school was very understanding and gave the girls a project to be completed when they were off so they were still doing school work during our holidays.
Parents should not have to lie about taking children out of school, as long as it doesn't happen every year they should be given some consideration about their situation and schools should be able to deal with each case on an individual basis.
Why have kids at all now, when the state wants to tell you how to raise them, dictating what goes into the packed lunches and when you can go on holiday.
If schools were more flexible in their approach then it would be less strain on family life, pity the poor teacher making the cup cakes, they clearly think themselves hard done by, however parents are also workers and making the best cup cakes they can while keep factories/shops hospitals going. We have to take the holidays out employers give us which often do not coincide with our partners or school holidays.
Get the syllabus on a web site so parents can supervise the catch ups and value the experiences that travelled or just relaxed children can bring to the classroom.
Life is more about finding ways to accomplish things than handing out fines. It is a tax on the poor, wealthy parents will not be deterred in the least, what we teach children is that if you can afford to flout the rules the school will support that. May as well teach them to bring the money for the fine in brown envelopes and let them know at an early age that everyone can be bought, even teacher.
Completely agree with Maggiemaybe. German system seems such a good idea on all counts. Not got to this problem myself yet as GCs too young so hoping it could be adopted before it is.
Well, this topic has raised some strong differences of opinion.
My opinion is that until teachers take their INSET days off in the holidays and not term time, they haven't got a leg to stand on. One rule for teachers, another for the children/parents.
On the subject of time off for funerals - when I worked in a school it was amazing how many children had half a dozen grandparents and also surprising that they all died in June/early July!
We're going on a family trip to Disney, Florida at half term in October. All the little'ns are going to be off school for an extra week. They all have excellent attendance, and it looks like their various schools are supportive. Can't see that this is going to disadvantage anyone greatly, to be honest. Of course, this is a exception, and all other trips are taken in school holidays. Children are so lucky these days: they still have the camping trips, days at the seaside - just spent Easter at Centr Parcs. But they also get to do more exotic things in far flung places. The world is a much smaller place ?
I don't like the subterfuge and having to pay for the privilege, which adds to the cost of the holiday. But as a retired teacher I believe firmly that children can learn much more out of school, not only about other cultures but about the importance of family and fun. Some families travel half way round the globe to link up. It's not worth going for a few days so kids can lose a lot of schooling but even that can be worthwhile.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.