Camilla-Queen Consort?

Sarnia.
There was was never to be any thing other than would be .
Hadn't the House of Windsor achieved their goal many years before when Princess Diana given them an heir and spare ?
After all what's in a title in comparison.?

Diana achieved her goal, the title came with the man so she had to get that ring on her finger

Horrible comment

From what my shooting friend told me, Annie is correct.

Why is a horrible comment ? The night before the wedding
she was heard singing‘tomorrow I will be the princess of Wales,
why did she meet him on a shoot when she hated shoots

Anniebach you've always had it in for Diana. Hard to understand your attitude.

Aveline that is not true, but the constant attacks on Camilla
which are based on lies is so wrong. I gave up trying to have a
discussion on the three involved , no one wants to, they just want to make Diana the victim whilst Charles and Camilla are
devils incarnate.

Anniebach over the years I have read your posts denigrating Diana over and over again. It's quite clear that Charles was in a relationship with Camilla when he married Diana. That's indubitably unpleasant. She was obviously very deeply unhappy and psychologically disturbed at times. Life in the Royal Family without a partner on your side must have been lonely and confusing for a not very bright girl with limited life experience.
As she grew older it's not surprising that she sought solace elsewhere - after all , Charles did.

Fed up with this gossipy thread.

Aveline please explain how you know Charles was in a relationship with Camilla when he married ?

Anniebach

Why is a horrible comment ? The night before the wedding
she was heard singing‘tomorrow I will be the princess of Wales,
why did she meet him on a shoot when she hated shoots

How on earth do you know that?

A groundsman at Clarence House said ,

Anniebach

A groundsman at Clarence House said ,

Who did he say it to? Was he a truthful person? How do you know this? Did you sing in a happy way before you got married?

Were those who said Chsrlescwas in an affair with Camilla when he married truthful people ?

Anniebach

Were those who said Chsrlescwas in an affair with Camilla when he married truthful people ?

Well that’s one way of (not) answering my questions. So it’s ok to reference dodgy sources because that what someone else did?
All a bit tedious really

Tina49

Anniebach

Were those who said Chsrlescwas in an affair with Camilla when he married truthful people ?

Well that’s one way of (not) answering my questions. So it’s ok to reference dodgy sources because that what someone else did?
All a bit tedious really

My aunt's penfriend's step cousin said that Diana was killed by the Archbishop of Canterbury because she intended to marry Dodi and raise William and Harry as Muslims.

No it isn’t ok to reference dodgy sources but it’s what’s done here, so I have decided to join them.

The problem with this thread is it’s all based on hearsay. We know what ‘someone else’ tells us, whether that someone else is the media (newspapers and television), the internet, the grounds man, the ‘official’ biographer, a ‘friend of Diana’ or the ubiquitous brother of a cousin’s next-door-neighbour who used to live in a tree house outside Diana’s window and heard it all verbatim.
It all ended sadly, but I’d still like to know who thinks Diana would have begrudged Charles later happiness?

Then it must be true Petra

Petera

Tina49

Anniebach

Were those who said Chsrlescwas in an affair with Camilla when he married truthful people ?

Well that’s one way of (not) answering my questions. So it’s ok to reference dodgy sources because that what someone else did?
All a bit tedious really

My aunt's penfriend's step cousin said that Diana was killed by the Archbishop of Canterbury because she intended to marry Dodi and raise William and Harry as Muslims.

Mollygo yes it all ended sadly and people were hurt.

What my shooting friend told me wasn’t hearsay, though of course when I repeat it it becomes hearsay. I have no reason to doubt his recollection of what he saw.

Anniebach

Then it must be true Petra

The source is as accurate as every other source here, pro- or anti-.

Like it or not we all rely on the media.

I don’t rely on the media , some even believe ‘The Crown’

Germanshepherdsmum

What my shooting friend told me wasn’t hearsay, though of course when I repeat it it becomes hearsay. I have no reason to doubt his recollection of what he saw.

Not wishing to disbelieve you or your friend, but I guess it may be that someone else might have passed on a different opinion, having been in the same place at the same time. If one was more a friend of the groom, rather than of the bride, type of thing.
And, at the end of the day, it’s not facts is it - it was someone’s opinion regarding another person.