Nannarose
It is dreadful. And often of course, the person who needs care doesn't really see it themselves.
My parents were very active members of their community all of their lives, volunteers and good neighbours, always helping others. It was awful when I had to point out that they were drifting into becoming dependant on their neighbours to an unreasonable degree - they really hadn't seen it. Mercifully, one of them was still able to work with me to sort out care properly (and the other went along with it!)
And I am of the opinion that the closing down of the old care homes and asylums was about selling them off - not about actually caring for people. I mean no disrespect to all of the people on here who have done their best as carers - this was a decision taken at a high level, with little regard to the fok actually doing the work.
Sorry aveline - not helping you!
And I am of the opinion that the closing down of the old care homes and asylums was about selling them off - not about actually caring for people.
I think it was seen as the cheaper option by those who manage the money and sold to the wider public and health services based on the premise that people are better off being cared for in their own homes, with family (if they have family), in familiar surroundings, which gives them a degree of autonomy and independence... and who, in principle, would argue with that?
However, in my opinion, the move was all part of the gradual destruction and privatisation of public services - the small state ideology of free-market liberalism.
If you are fairly wealthy, you can afford to buy all the care you need - you can even have live-in carers - but for the majority it means being at the mercy of carers who are hired cheaply, undervalued, in insufficient numbers, and who are expected to manage case-loads beyond their capacity.
Aveline's lady needs 24-hour care, not carers popping in twice a day (or whatever) for 15-minute sessions.