Retroladywriting
Dearknees1
The weight of evidence leads me and many othersto believe that JFK’s murder was orchestrated by the CIA. Does that make me a conspiracy theorist in the same category as those who believe we have been invaded by lizard like aliens? I think not.
That was the point I was making about Covid and Wuhan. Thinking that one event has been covered up does not make anyone a Conspiracy Theorist in the same league as, for example, David Icke and his Lizard people.
Thinking one event has been covered up does not make one a conspiracy theorist in the same league as say David Icke
You're right, there is a difference, especially nowadays when to just comment on or voice a CT leaves one open to pejorative, negative, ridicule.
But don't you think there was a time when people would have been agast at the thought of their government murdering a serving President, especially one so popular?
It would have been unthinkable I believe, to most.
I don't know when, but at some point the world divided into those who accepted the narrative, and those who didn't were labelled conspiracy theorists.
I was curious to understand what mechanism converted a conspiracy to a main stream accepted event.
Most seem to think the emergence of information they believe is the tipping point.
Which begs the question by what method do any of us make an assessment of fact or fiction, before
There is real evidence?
Is it childhood experiences, is it education, or do sone of use have literally more synapses firing at a greater speed to help us differentiate ideas that go some where from those that do not.
Someone said there are no bad ideas.
We none of us are in receipt of all the facts all of the time.
So why do some feel it necessary to attack those with unusual ideas?
Presumably because they feel threatened?
How does an idea illicit a fight or flight response?
BTW Retroladywriting and Dearknees1 I'm not expecting you to come up with any stunning revelations, or even reply, just musing 😃