I get slightly annoyed when those of us who choose to safeguard are referred to as if we are neurotic or lacking in courage. We have looked at the risks, assessed our situation and made our decision. So, presumably, have the people who are mixing more in the community.
The virus is still active and we don't know whether there will be a surge in cases as schools open and more people return to work. Hopefully not, but we don't know. I don't feel that it's safe enough to venture out yet.
I know that if I get the virus, it will almost certainly affect my heart condition and, judging by the damage that the virus does to the heart and other organs, I am quite likely to die. I also don't want to lose my husband, who has some risk factors as well. Leicester, where we live, has topped the charts for infection rates. I think it makes sense to be cautious. If people are more afraid in Britain than elsewhere, that's probably due to us having the highest death toll in Europe and our realisation that we are being governed by a pack of incompetent nincompoops. Hardly likely to instill confidence, is it?
As for courage... In a pandemic, playing a key role in healing the sick or providing vital services are acts of courage, because they are needed. Anything else is a personal choice. People who go out may consider themselves brave, people who stay in may consider themselves wise. None of us know if we are making the right decisions.