Norah Perhaps it is the RF that is in the right snd PH who is in the wrong, and perhaps it is he who should do the apologising. Nobody knows because we have only heard one side of the story and many people have taken sides on that basis.
There are very few families who if their story was published in a widely publicised book writtten by one person in their family who feels they are badly done by, wouldn't read like PH's.
The question that arises is whether those memories are ever strictly accurate. Yes, the authors believes they are passionately, but, as the late Queen said, recollections may differ.
Talking family matters over at various times with my sister and DD, I have been surprised how often our memories of the same events can be entirely different. Sometimes we can check things out with someone else, sometimes we can reach an agreed version, at other times we agree to differ. The point of view each of us brings to the memory affects our recollections.
My DD once laid into me about how I had let her down as a teenager. It was a bit of a surprise, but I could recognise what she was saying, but I was also aware that for some things there were reasons for my actions that she didn't know of, others were true but on one accusation she was completely wrong. I said nothing at the time because I wanted to make sure I made no mistakes.
I disscussed the whole event separately with DS and DH, In each case when I mentioned one thing DD said, they both immediately said, she is completely wrong. We all had clear and matching memories of a fairly trivial event we had all been present for that she denied ever happened. It had never been discussed before, it was not a family shattering event. But three of us remembered the event and what happened and she was the centre of it, but DD had been quite ill at the time, which probably explains her lack of memory of the event. I have never dicussed it further with her, some things are best left unsaid.
So my own experiences, this event and others, has left me very doubtful of these personal memories, especially when they are diatribes like PH's and almost entirely uncorrobarated . They are based on memory and intepretation and open conversations within a family may well place different interpretations on the same event, or at least bring an understanding of each sides view of the event and are by far the best way forward before bridges are destroyed irrevocably.
However, let us be realistic, H&M's ideas of the kind of life they wanted to lead in the USA was based on them having a lot of money, and the only way to get that money was to write the kind of book he wrote 'revealing all', the 'poor me' interviews and the clever ghost writers, and, as he said, more volumes may follow (if the funds run low). In our family there is a description of some one determined to make money at all costs. It is: He/She would render their grandmother down for lard, (if they could make money on it). This is rather what he has done.