Far North she resents me because I get to do all the fun stuff with him that she wants to do and I understand that but you have to put the hard work in to get the fun stuff and you also need tons of patience and empathy , some things she has demonstrated by the treatment of her poor little dog that she has not got
She seems to think it is my fault she has not got her son back because I am ''holding on to him'' and she thinks I should have no concerns about her ( or turn a blind eye to any ) so if I report her I am a 'traitor'
I will be notifying the sw if contact becomes too difficult or hostile
The guardian contacted me today and they have appointed this new one who sounds lovely on the phone , very rational and clear and she WANTS to know my concerns and she is coming to visit us on Monday
I do not want to get too optimistic but there are 4 people here who want little man to remain with me 1/ The SW and child protection dept 2/ The guardian by the sounds of it 3/ Me and 4/ Little man himself!! ... The ONLY one pushing for his return is my daughter but it was nice that the guardian reminded me today that if the authorities had no concerns about my Grandson they would not be taking her to court , they would just hand him over , especially as she still has parental responsibility , it would make things easier and cheaper but they would not be doing their jobs properly if they did that and their solicitor is gathering evidence for the reasons NOT to return him as they have concerns as well , the guardian wants to know where HE wants to stay and what will be best for him , my solicitor will be evidencing how much better off he will be with me permanently and so it is only one person in court with their solicitor who is actually going against 3 other authorities including child protection themselves who have a duty to protect the child!
The judge said the only reason a care order was not granted was because my daughter promised not to remove him! I was thinking it was because he wanted my Grandson returned but that is not the case and the main person here is my Grandson and HE gets to have a say now and I am SO happy about that because why would he start wetting himself when his Mum told him he has his room at her house now?
The guardian will be taking things like that into account plus the fact that he only stopped wetting himself over the 6 weeks school holidays when he had less contact and was more settled and his anxiety reduced!
Beginning to think I may have a case now , was worried the judge was supporting my daughter's case but there are many other 'strands' to this and the main thing my daughter is going on is her parental rights plus not drinking heavy like before but it will take more than that to be given the full time care of a vulnerable child who 1/ Is already settled and happy and wants to remain where he is and 2/ Has limited speech and if anything happened he could not even tell anyone
Plus it does not look good that my daughter is lying in court and getting a 2 bedroom flat and decorating a room and saying ''I am getting my son back'' is no ruddy guarantee!!!
I feel like she is trying to bully and lie to get him back and I understand she feels he 'belongs' to her because he is her child but he is not an item of ruddy property he is a little boy with feelings and emotions and complex needs who needs the best support possible in life and I know I keep bringing it up but if you can lock a dog you supposed to 'love' in a drawer as a punishment when angry what the hell will you do to the son you 'love' and 'loving him' did not mean you stopped drinking and got help while he was in your 'care' , let alone 3 years later and I feel she has had 'every' chance and yet knowing she is on her last chance she is still choosing to lie and trick her way through it to get him back rather than do the hard work involved on herself and be honest about needing help and about where she is really at!!
I need ruddy help and I am not going to pretend I do not!
Thing is if she was honest with everyone she would have more chance of getting him back , they took her to court because he said she was going to remove him by Christmas because she was ''better now'' and if she said she was not going to remove him because she needed more time to proper work on her ( genuine ) recovery they could have worked with her without even court being involved and once proper proved herself fit they could have returned him ( rather than say I am removing him soon because I am better now and they along with me have their doubts so of course they would take her to court before December!! )
Silly girl!