Gransnet forums

Grandparenting

Are we being unreasonable?

(291 Posts)
Emma64 Tue 23-Aug-22 16:23:35

My gs is 30 months old and I have looked after him every Friday for the last 18 months or so. I think my husband and I have a really close relationship with my son and his gf and love having our gs for the day. They have been fairly strict since the beginning- fair enough, their child but mostly around taking him out. I haven’t had my car for the last 18 months as I’ve lent it to my son but I’ve always had to ask permission even to go for a walk. I’ve finally got my car back and was hoping to hang on to the car seat but they want to sell it. A few weeks ago they asked me to watch him at theirs as he’d had a long week!? This would be from 7.30 to 4.30. I texted and said could we grab the car seat and him and bring him back to ours as my husband had a rare Friday off and we had a few things to do locally. Also, that we want to spend the day together and he wants to spend time with his gs. I then received a text saying how unfair that was! We ended up having a row over the phone and did has taken Friday off for the past 3 weeks. We haven’t had any contact apart from my son saying we need to discuss things in the next few weeks. I have know idea why this is such a big ask. Going forward they had already asked me to watch him at theres from 7-5.30 each week. They live in an isolated area and with no car seat I can’t even walk to a park or shop. Is this fair?

Allsorts Tue 06-Sept-22 21:26:34

I think for a lot of people it appears that grandparents are not to be trusted to be with their grandchildren. All these rules, I might add most of us have common sense, do respect parents wishes without needing a manual on it. I’ve looked after all of mine, all of them had sleep overs etc, all returned intact and happy.

VioletSky Tue 06-Sept-22 21:46:05

My Dad is an excellent grandparent

Callistemon21 Tue 06-Sept-22 22:07:28

VioletSky

Callistemon21

Another aunt would put them down on their tummies to sleep saying they would sleep better

That was the rule in the 1970s, VioletSky!

Woe betide any young mother who failed to heed that advice, sorry order from the Health Visitor. Visiting the Baby Clinic was not so much for advice as to be told what you must do with your child. Perhaps your aunt had been told, as we were, that it would help to prevent SIDs.
My DD hated it but I persevered because of that fear.
I was more relaxed and confident with DC2.

I posted an info graphic yesterday which shows how sleeping òn their backs reduced instances of SIDS by a great amount.

I appreciate my aunt was a mother in the 70s

However, advice changed in the 90s, so I politely didn't do as she suggested and turned them after she put them down.

If they change the advice back (given the correlation of data, this is unlikely but still) I will follow parents direction and respect their choices....

Not my baby, not my responsibility... theirs

If something were to happen in my cate, I would at least have the comfort of having followed instructions to the letter

Fair enough and I ignored the rules myself after DC1.
I listened to my mother instead who thought sleeping on tummies was wrong.

VioletSky Wed 07-Sept-22 00:30:44

SIDS wasn't understood back then, the advice to front sleep was in case of vomit.

Information wasn't correlated the way it is today. People had no idea front sleeping significantly increased SIDS.

So given how data and understanding has changed, I certainly won't advise my children to ignore guidance.

I just don't think I know better

Back then, your mother was right, although you don't state her reasoning...

I still trust those who proved her right scientifically more. Everything starts as a hypothesis, but we don't experiment with babies do we, unfortunately we have to learn the hard way

Mandrake Wed 07-Sept-22 03:17:56

Allsorts

I think for a lot of people it appears that grandparents are not to be trusted to be with their grandchildren. All these rules, I might add most of us have common sense, do respect parents wishes without needing a manual on it. I’ve looked after all of mine, all of them had sleep overs etc, all returned intact and happy.

Mine weren't trusted in their own home because I, as an adult, couldn't relax there because of their dog. It attacked everyone, including myself. If I couldn't trust them to keep me safe around the dog, no way were they being trusted with a much smaller bodied person who could get terrible damage from an attack.

I've been in the car with MIL and felt I had to hold on for dear life. I've been in the car when she ran a red light. No way is she driving my child.

Among other things. So no, I didn't trust her with my children and it was my job to protect them. They couldn't protect themselves.

Madgran77 Wed 07-Sept-22 06:54:52

Mine weren't trusted in their own home because I, as an adult, couldn't relax there because of their dog. It attacked everyone, including myself. If I couldn't trust them to keep me safe around the dog, no way were they being trusted with a much smaller bodied person who could get terrible damage from an attack

I've been in the car with MIL and felt I had to hold on for dear life. I've been in the car when she ran a red light. No way is she driving my child

Among other things. So no, I didn't trust her with my children and it was my job to protect them. They couldn't protect themselves

And you were right ofcourse Mandrake. Any responsible parent wouldn't trust those GPS in those circumstances.

In other circumstances, with different grandparents who did not display these palpable risk issues, parents would reasonably make different decisions. I did with my mum and dad and my son and family did with me before they moved away.

Smileless2012 Wed 07-Sept-22 10:21:37

You were absolutely right Mandrake.

Norah Wed 07-Sept-22 11:55:39

Allsorts

I think for a lot of people it appears that grandparents are not to be trusted to be with their grandchildren. All these rules, I might add most of us have common sense, do respect parents wishes without needing a manual on it. I’ve looked after all of mine, all of them had sleep overs etc, all returned intact and happy.

Of course parents have rules for their children. There are rules for everything in life, why wouldn't parents lay in rules concerning their children?

My daughters didn't have a 'manual' but they certainly had rules for us to follow. I've looked after my 12 GC/GGC (thankfully no sleepovers).

I find it disrespectful to use the word 'manual' to describe the rules others have for their children. Similar to 'what happens at GP stays at GP' - teaching children to keep secrets sets the stage for a future abusive person.

Farmor15 Wed 07-Sept-22 12:32:57

"Similar to 'what happens at GP stays at GP' - teaching children to keep secrets sets the stage for a future abusive person."

I don't know anyone who would say that to GC. Some here say "Grandma's house, Grandma's rules" which usually mean that they are stricter with GC than the parents are - eg sitting at table for meals.

Hithere Wed 07-Sept-22 12:43:19

If The OP here has a questionable driving history, I doubt she would include it in her writing

Those observations usually come from others viewing the situation outside in, not the other way around

My father and mother claim they are safe drivers, I beg to differ

Norah Wed 07-Sept-22 12:47:37

Farmor15

^"Similar to 'what happens at GP stays at GP' - teaching children to keep secrets sets the stage for a future abusive person."^

I don't know anyone who would say that to GC. Some here say "Grandma's house, Grandma's rules" which usually mean that they are stricter with GC than the parents are - eg sitting at table for meals.

I've read many instances where GP willfully spoils, give choco buttons, crisps, fizzy drinks, keeps GC up late, allows telly.

Not at all stricter, just doing whatever GP wishes against AC wishes.

I'm not technically adroit, but can look for examples.

Madgran77 Wed 07-Sept-22 16:58:51

Farmor15

^"Similar to 'what happens at GP stays at GP' - teaching children to keep secrets sets the stage for a future abusive person."^

I don't know anyone who would say that to GC. Some here say "Grandma's house, Grandma's rules" which usually mean that they are stricter with GC than the parents are - eg sitting at table for meals.

I have to say that I have actually met and observed two grandparents who regularly say that to their 5-year-old grandson! They all sit there and giggle with each other about it!!

So it does happen, but none of us can know how often - anecdotal "evidence" is not a measure of frequency or commonality or common practice and as I have said many times GPs (and parents) are not an amorphous mass!

Norah Wed 07-Sept-22 18:59:22

Madgran77

Farmor15

"Similar to 'what happens at GP stays at GP' - teaching children to keep secrets sets the stage for a future abusive person."

I don't know anyone who would say that to GC. Some here say "Grandma's house, Grandma's rules" which usually mean that they are stricter with GC than the parents are - eg sitting at table for meals.

I have to say that I have actually met and observed two grandparents who regularly say that to their 5-year-old grandson! They all sit there and giggle with each other about it!!

So it does happen, but none of us can know how often - anecdotal "evidence" is not a measure of frequency or commonality or common practice and as I have said many times GPs (and parents) are not an amorphous mass!

Of course it happens. Naturally we don't know how often.

Of course people say "don't tell we had choco buttons, stayed up too late, did whatever DS expressly forbid."

It's a play on a slogan.

"What Happens Here, Stays Here -- is a slogan and advertising campaign for the city of Las Vegas, Nevada."

Putting a foot wrong -- leads the way to whinging GP.

Plumblady Thu 08-Sept-22 06:36:38

Hithere

If The OP here has a questionable driving history, I doubt she would include it in her writing

Those observations usually come from others viewing the situation outside in, not the other way around

My father and mother claim they are safe drivers, I beg to differ

This is exactly what was going through my mind!

I would never ever allow my parents, God rest them, to drive my children anywhere! Nowadays I wont allow my DH to drive my grandchildren anywhere (to the great relief of my son)!

OP, I would accept their conditions if you want to babysit on Fridays. Dont allow this situation to drag on and drive a wedge between you. Look on the bright side:- their house, their energy bill, their mess, their food! You can go home to a nice tidy house and collapse in front of the telly!

Good luck I hope it works out x

NotSpaghetti Thu 08-Sept-22 12:23:36

I was wary (years ago) of one of my really good friends driving and hated him giving my children lifts. I would go way out of my way to try to circumvent it. If he had wanted to collect my children to play at his house with his children I nearly always had a great excuse to be "driving that way" just at the right moment!

It's not only grandparents - some much younger drivers were/are a menace on the road!