Gransnet forums

Legal, pensions and money

It's Insulting The Way Pensioners Are Being Grovelled Over.

(113 Posts)
mae13 Tue 28-May-24 11:01:14

If the Tories really intended to raise the Income Tax threshhold it could have been done, but not tacked onto the manifesto as if they've just remembered us - how doo-lally do they imagine we are? And Labour will likely dream up some reason - should they win - why they can't improve things for us "just yet."

Well, if I were an MP on 94,00 per annum (plus a few part-time directorships to keep my finances ticking over) I probably wouldn't feel it was necessary to get off my arse on behalf of others too quickly(pardon the language.)

I've lived long enough to see several elections come and go.......nothing but disillusionment EVERY time.

If politicians could just keep one promise they might not have the reputation they've acquired.

Gummie Sat 01-Jun-24 11:26:40

Maggiemaybe

I’m neither delighted or insulted by this proposal. I just feel it would be fairer all round if any change to the personal allowance applied to everyone.

We already have plenty of youngsters who’d be voting for the implementation of Logan’s Run at 60.

Fully agree with Maggiemaybe.

Change the tax personal allowance threshold for everyone.
But as I will be a pensioner in the not too distant future I have no issue with ensuring that my 'state pension' is not taxed.

Brahumbug Sun 02-Jun-24 12:19:42

maddyone

It doesn’t need to be big to push a pensioner into paying income tax because the state pension is only a couple of thousands below the tax free allowance. Pretty well any private pension will push a pensioner into paying tax! However small that private pension maybe.

Not true, many people have a state pension well in excess of the tax allowance already.

Jackiest Sun 02-Jun-24 12:30:36

The tax threshold should be raised to the minimum wage as this is what you need to live on. This will cost a lot of money so raise the tax rate so that a person on average wage will pay the same tax as before. This will of course mean that the poor will pay less tax and the rich will pay more. Not something that the present government is keen on doing.

Oreo Sun 02-Jun-24 12:46:05

Gummie

Maggiemaybe

I’m neither delighted or insulted by this proposal. I just feel it would be fairer all round if any change to the personal allowance applied to everyone.

We already have plenty of youngsters who’d be voting for the implementation of Logan’s Run at 60.

Fully agree with Maggiemaybe.

Change the tax personal allowance threshold for everyone.
But as I will be a pensioner in the not too distant future I have no issue with ensuring that my 'state pension' is not taxed.

I agree as well.
The Logans Run reference made me 😂and😬

MaizieD Sun 02-Jun-24 12:56:41

Brahumbug

maddyone

It doesn’t need to be big to push a pensioner into paying income tax because the state pension is only a couple of thousands below the tax free allowance. Pretty well any private pension will push a pensioner into paying tax! However small that private pension maybe.

Not true, many people have a state pension well in excess of the tax allowance already.

Can you justify that statement with examples, please?

The current 'new' state pension is £2,000 less than the current personal allowance. Where does the extra come from that you are claiming some people have?

nanna8

We're talking about state pension here. Additional pension has always been taxed if it carries one over the threshold.

Brahumbug Sun 02-Jun-24 16:01:41

Lots of people receive more than the so called new state pension. My father for example receives just over £300 a week! The 'old' pension consisted of a basic pension plus SERPS and S2P which boost it. Many people now retiring have projected payments from the older scheme which means they receive more than the new pension. The post 2016 pension of £221 a week is the maximum that someone can get (unless they have a protected pension amount) and most retirees don't even get that, destroying the idea that the new pension is more generous than the old.

GrannyGravy13 Sun 02-Jun-24 16:10:13

I am rather baffled.

We have this thread with posters wanting the personal allowance to be increased as they do not want to fall into paying tax at the same time as a different thread where posters are saying they are happy to pay more tax…

Germanshepherdsmum Sun 02-Jun-24 16:15:14

I am equally baffled.

Susie42 Mon 03-Jun-24 14:35:04

I have never not paid tax except when I first started work. Even when I was claiming JSA I paid tax as my DB pension combined with with JSA was more than the Personal Allowance.
When I retired pensioners had a higher Personal Allowance but this was abolished in 2011.

Wyllow3 Mon 03-Jun-24 14:40:18

GrannyGravy13

I am rather baffled.

We have this thread with posters wanting the personal allowance to be increased as they do not want to fall into paying tax at the same time as a different thread where posters are saying they are happy to pay more tax…

It's not a contradiction. Those of us who have said yes we'd pay what we can doesn't remove the need for fairer personal allowances.

Germanshepherdsmum Mon 03-Jun-24 14:43:25

It’s a contradiction when a poster doesn’t want to pay any tax but on another thread says they would be happy to pay more tax.

Norah Mon 03-Jun-24 15:44:22

Germanshepherdsmum

It’s a contradiction when a poster doesn’t want to pay any tax but on another thread says they would be happy to pay more tax.

Seems so!