Trisher just going back to your point about criticism of Labour not explaining how it will fund its policies, then criticism of them when they do, I take your point, but I don't think it applies here. The funding issue really relates to spending as a whole, not individual items. Actually I think Labour have said how they propose to fund their policies overall - they have set outline tax rises and (substantial) borrowing plans. More detail to come I imagine. But why say "charge vat on school fees to pay for free school meals". Why not better cancer treatment? Or better care for the elderly? Or to build more affordable housing? What happens when the two figures don't balance anymore (less kids go the private schools, the cost of school meals goes up....?) Do we then stop giving free meals? What if more than enough is collected - do we throw in a light breakfast? It's all just a colourful soundbite. But I suppose that's politics.
ps Jen - impressive all round qualifications! I scraped 6 O Levels and a "Confidence" swimming certificate!