Gransnet forums

News & politics

Younger people’s views beyond March 2019.

(181 Posts)
MarthaBeck Fri 15-Feb-19 13:16:08

I have read a great deal in these columns about Brexit and strong differing views on having a People’s Vote based on views in 2019, including those of young people. We had a
‪deep discussion on Brexit over a cuppa at our older people’s club this morning. Though Mrs May nor @jeremycorbyn would have been very happy about the views expressed.‬ There was strong support for a @peoplesvote_uk that would give young people the opportunity to have their say.‬

Yet, I have not heard such strong views expressed in these columns, even though Brexit is more about the future of the UK in many decades to come. Ironically, in the years when most reading these columns will no longer be affected. How many of you expect to be around in 30 to 40 years, so why do we still try to deny our teenage 16 + grand children their views, three of my 16+ Grandchildren are preparing to plan their University course and future jobs? Why should I deny them the right to define the UK future .

Are we so prejudiced that we continue to oppose allowing the Electorate including 16+ to have a view in 2019 on the future of the UK ?

minniemouse Sat 16-Feb-19 15:01:24

The young ones will get their turn at the next elections. We had a vote, remember ? We live in a Democracy, don't we ? Or are we part of the new order that takes offence to everything ? We as a nation voted for Brexit. End of ! Stop shillyshallying and heed the democratic vote. No 2nd People's Vote ! What utter nonsense from folk who didn't like the result of the first referendum. Get over it and move on !

sharon103 Sat 16-Feb-19 15:06:00

Love it breeze. lol

sharon103 Sat 16-Feb-19 15:07:01

Very good posts GabriellaG54

Barmeyoldbat Sat 16-Feb-19 15:23:47

Minniemouse, the reason I want a 2nd vote is not because I didn't like the result of the first one but because we are in such utter chaos and could leave with no deal. That is what we should be voting for, stay or leave with a no deal. My thought for the outcome will be a delay in leaving and then we will have a vote.

AdeleJay Sat 16-Feb-19 15:27:12

I so agree, am in the same boat. Ah well, we will have to carry on doing our best for ourselves & our families. But what to do about our hard win voting rights?

lemongrove Sat 16-Feb-19 15:30:24

minniemouse spot on!
All this denying of wanting a second vote ( because they didn’t like the results of the first one) is hard to swallow.
I would respect them more if they all came out and said ‘ yes, we hated the result and are doing our damn best to reverse it’......at least it would be honest.

Ramblingrose22 Sat 16-Feb-19 15:41:30

Agree with Fearless. Retired65 shouldn't believe everything they read on Facebook (FB)!

If anyone on FB claims the Treaty of Lisbon requires us to go on to the Euro and be in the Schengen area where are the references to prove it?

When I am given the references and looked them up myself, then I might believe these claims.

Tooyoungytobeagrandma Sat 16-Feb-19 15:44:23

There is no way my kids would have been ready to make informed decisions at 16 (my dd not even at 18). Yes they have a wealth of knowledge at their fingertips (Google etc ) but at this age are mainly interested in themselves and their lives and live for the moment rather than the future. I think once my eldest had finished university he was better equipped for reasoned argument and similarly my youngest at 21 more interested and able to see and reason all sides (both voted, but differently on Brexit! ) As for it affecting youngsters more than the older generation yes but I have no intentions of going anywhere for at least another 20 years so it will affect me and many others especially as people are living longer. I have worked with the 13 -18 age group and in all honesty the majority were not either interested, knowledgeable enough to vote, also when recruiting find many seem to be lacking in general life skills or common sense imo.They do have to stay in education until 18 now which does not suit all but personally I feel 18 is young enough.

lemongrove Sat 16-Feb-19 16:01:53

Tooyoungtobe ???

Urmstongran Sat 16-Feb-19 16:03:49

Brilliant posts cakebaker. ?? I totally agree with you.

breeze Sat 16-Feb-19 16:04:39

Tooyoungtobe good post.

Retired65 Sat 16-Feb-19 16:35:38

Ramblingrose22: References given in post further back plus
see www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/10935617/After-2020-all-EU-members-will-have-to-adopt-the-euro.html

Retired65 Sat 16-Feb-19 16:39:41

Fearless, I am sorry what false information? Explain please? Thank you.

POGS Sat 16-Feb-19 16:48:33

This thread was asking if 16 year old children should have the right to vote ' IF ' there was a 2nd Referendum / Peoples Vote, call it which you like but they are the same thing.

Why is the question only asking if 16 year olds should vote in another Referendum ?

The faux argument put forward of the EU Referendum being ' their ' future , ' theirs.' to decide is only worth it's weight in salt if the argument extends to General Elections too.

It is either thought at 16 children are so wise they understand what they are voting for whether it be, Leave/Remain in the EU, understand the Political Nuance of the different parties and where they stand on subjects such as Euthanasia, Taxation, Employment, Defence, Pensions all the subjects we as voters reflect on to decide which Political Party we as individuals feel are closer to our thoughts because we too also have to make decisions as to ' Our ' futures.

Children of 16 years are either intelligent, worldly enough to vote for what is their future or not!

Personally I am happy to show my colours and say NO but I don't buy into the argument the EU Referendum should or could be a separate entity if the argument is solely based on voting because it is ' Their ' future.

MaizieD Sat 16-Feb-19 16:50:55

starbird says to me

Are you sure your info on the Lisbon Treaty is correct? Can you give a source?

As I haven't given any information at all about the Lisbon Treaty I'm not sure why I am being asked this. On the other hand, the information that was posted here from Facebook is complete and utter nonsense.

Here is the Lisbon Treaty text. Perhaps Retired65 would like to point out exactly where all the things in the facebook list are written,

www.eutruth.org.uk/lisbontreaty.pdf

And here is a series of fact sheets on the Lisbon treaty for those of you who might not want to wade through the 200+ pages of the Treaty itself

www.robert-schuman.eu/en/understanding-the-lisbon-treaty

Jalima1108 Sat 16-Feb-19 16:55:03

Are you going to test us on it later MaizieD?

I'd better get started

Marianne1953 Sat 16-Feb-19 16:58:05

I always thought that they should have let the 16 year old to vote in the Brexit referendum, however, even though I voted Remain, I feel we should not have another referendum because the government has made a mess of the deal. How do you know that this has been done on purpose, so that they can get what they want. It would not be democratic to have another referendum. I do think we should have a say on the deal though.
Going back to lowering the age, a lot of young people couldn’t even be bothered to vote for the last one.

Retired65 Sat 16-Feb-19 17:04:38

Well for starters , Maizie D I have found from the link you posted the following.

page 12 The Union shall establish an economic and monetary union whose currency is the euro.

page 62 The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt measures on fixing prices, levies, aid and quantitative limitations and on the fixing and allocation of fishing opportunities.";

Chucky Sat 16-Feb-19 17:24:39

If the vote was given to 16 year olds, many would just vote the way their parents tell them. Some have very little experience of “real life” therefore I would be against giving them a vote. I know many will disagree with me but everyone is allowed to have an opinion.
As far as I am concerned we have already had our vote on Brexit, so why another referendum? It is an insult to try to overrule it on the basis that people didn’t know what they were voting for! The information was there if you wanted to find it.
MPs are in power to represent their constituents, therefore they should vote in Parliament the way their Constituency voted. Another insult if they say they know better than the people they represent.
For what it’s worth, I voted Remain in the referendum, however I accepted the DEMOCRATIC will of the British people in wishing to leave. If there was another vote I would therefore vote leave, both because I believe in democracy and, possibly more importantly, I think there has been far to much damage done now between the EU and the UK for us to stay in the EU.

Gaggi3 Sat 16-Feb-19 17:24:59

I think basing someone's right to vote on their financial /work/housing status would be very wrong and retrograde. and only too representative of the current materialistic climate. Years ago many people lived in council houses and never owned their own, should they have been prevented from voting? Young people are the ones who are going to have to deal with this incredible shambles long after most of us are gone. I want better for my family and the community at large..
Differing ages for marriage, voting etc are confusing. The age of criminal responsibility is 10!

POGS Sat 16-Feb-19 17:29:24

Gaggi

"I think basing someone's right to vote on their financial /work/housing status would be very wrong and retrograde. and only too representative of the current materialistic climate. Years ago many people lived in council houses and never owned their own, should they have been prevented from voting? "

Sorry have I missed something?

Has this been mentioned?

MaizieD Sat 16-Feb-19 18:14:48

And all those dates, Retired? Are they in the Lisbon Treaty?

And, in case you hadn't noticed, the 'economic and monetary union has happened, but it doesn't include all the member states and many of them don't look at all likely to do it at all. And Cameron had obtained agreement that we should never have to join the euro; to be written into treaty.

Next?

Horatia Sat 16-Feb-19 18:21:10

When I was 16 my ideas and experience were so limited and immature naturally. I would have been easily influenced. As I grew into adulthood and then parenthood, I drew my own conclusions about who I wanted to vote for from experience always voting with the future in mind. I believe all parents and grandparents do have an investment in the future - the wellbeing of their children and grandchildren.

MaizieD Sat 16-Feb-19 18:27:05

OK, Retired, try this:

tompride.wordpress.com/2018/12/15/leavers-already-campaigning-to-win-second-referendum-on-social-media-with-even-worse-lies-than-before/

Zsarina Sat 16-Feb-19 18:33:55

Let children be children, stop trying to force them to be older than their years. There are a lot more years to come than what is left behind...16 year olds may be intelligent enough to express opinions but I don’t think the future of the country should be left to them..let them learn by experiencing living and that cannot be put on young shoulders.