venall Our entry into the Common Market was ratified by a referendum won by a majority of 34%. I think you'll agree that that percentage was larger than that of the 2016 referendum. Yet - not everyone accepted that result and some have been trying to overturn it ever since. So, why shouldn't Remainers seek a second referendum to replace the fraudulent first referendum?
Day6 Many people who voted in the referendum in 2016 had no idea what to do once they entered the polling booth. So, yes they do need educating. I have friends who have manned polling stations for more than 30 years and they were amazed at the behaviour of some voters. They were rude and aggressive and demanded proof that their ballot papers wouldn't be changed or destroyed.
I didn't see it myself but my partner says someone was talking on tv on Sunday morning about someone who proudly announced that they had voted leave and then asked what was the EU. I'll ask him what the programme was tomorrow.
Partly about immigrants which was nonsense, now it is mostly about being told what to do by foreigners. That is the line that most of my Brexit friends take ( they are still friends).
Well one good thing has come out of all this chaos...the British Public have thrown off their apathy re politics. Everyone now has an opinion, informed or not, and is not afraid to voice it!
One thing we did learn yesterday is that Johnson is useless at the dispatch box and cannot be remotely trusted, and Mogg is the epitome of arrogance, unpleasant sarcasm, entitlement and disrespect in his words and body language.
Day6 Many people who voted in the referendum in 2016 had no idea what to do once they entered the polling booth. So, yes they do need educating. I have friends who have manned polling stations for more than 30 years and they were amazed at the behaviour of some voters. They were rude and aggressive and demanded proof that their ballot papers wouldn't be changed or destroyed.
Dinahmo so many rude and aggressive people could have voted remain with no clear idea what they were voting for. After all, none of us knows what the future holds in or out of the EU.
I'm beginning to think that rather than a GE there should be a prolongued period of public education on the subject - compulsory for all voters - followed by a second referendum. Problem would be, how to avoid bias. Mainly on the facts about the EU and how it operates, how it affects us etc. The result would only be advisory of course. Still can't see the point of a GE.