H & M wish list

If you say so ananimous if you say so ??????

Ok, maybe the others are the same as me. Or perhaps the Sussexes have employed us all to turn up on threads and say nice things about her ?

Hazza and Megs are still knee deep in blackmailing negotiations with the RF - please fawn away plebs...

Nezumi65 - have just read the link - however, as I have just said in my previous post, and contrary to the link, not ALL of the criticism IS about race, (some yes, but certainly not all) I for one didn't give her race (or her parents' race) a second thought.

suziewoozie

If you say so ananimous if you say so ??????

I say call it as you see it ananimous

Suziewoozie

Hahaha, you really must must think I have nothing better to do
I couldn’t give a toss what you do with your time, and I certainly will not be reporting you or anyone else, so don’t worry.
I thought it curious that there are so many ‘new’ posters. You obviously have no interest in doing anything more useful with your time, judging by the number of your (and other yours) posts on all the H+M threads. You’re probably the most frequent poster

You have been spewing hatred and bile all day yesterday and now apparently today as well. Never mind, you carry on. You really must be an unhappy person.

Anyway, I’m off now to do something useful.

So what is the criticism about? Her crossing her legs? I don’t get it.

Can't imagine the queen writing on a banana under any circumstances...

At least we are providing interest for Sooziewoozie and diverting her from other threads

Nezumi65 - well, as I have already stated, my criticism of Meghan is regarding her treatment of her family. We may all have members of our family that we don't get along with, that embarrass us, that we don't particularly like, but I wouldn't dream of cutting them out of my life (unless of course they were cruel or making me ill). I just think that Meghan should at least have gone to see her father.

I don’t think they’ve lost anything, I think they said they didn’t want it. The titles, the house etc. They said they didn’t want Archie to have a title at the outset. I think they’ve got what they wanted. Win win.

maddy have you absolutely no SOH? Bloody hell

www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2019/12/25/accidents-feuds-epstein-prince-andrew-scandal-another-annus/

Megxit is makingthe news about Prince Andrew staying 4 days with a convicted paedo news go away...

As the old music hall song said (can't remember its title !) .Let them Go, Let them tarry, Let them sink or let them swim ….the

Why the need to register under another (or multiple) name? Sorry to be dim but I don’t understand the reasoning! Stand tall by your ‘own’ comments surely?
#sameusernamealways

Cant blame them for getting away from all the s.it that has happened, and still happening. Good luck to them I say.

urm you’ve missed the point as well - it was a sardonic joke because of maddys post about new posters.

tickingbird I understand irony just fine, thank you.

Perhaps you should look It up in a dictionary if you’re going to be so nasty about other people and their views.

But, attempting to stand on a moral high ground about how nasty some posters are while being equally nasty about public figures is basically the gist of it.

You are welcome to have your views about a public couple, of course, but get off your high horse that you aren’t also being unkind in general. Just because they aren’t reading these posts doesn’t make it so you aren’t being unkind.

I think you all on here are fighting between yourselves and not really acknowledging the original post.
Now the queen as spoken I wish them well whereever they end up.
This is just dribble.

Told you I can be dim sooziewoozie! That went ‘whoosh’ right over my head. Apologies therefore from me!
#dimwithsamename

suziewoozie - do you often write on bananas? If not, how do you know?

Do you curlywhirly? Meghan’s father seems a toxic money grubbing horror to me. As for her sister.... I don’t blame her for distancing herself (& any children) from that.

I mean look at him - he sounds completely pissed in this. www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-51166306/thomas-markle-meghan-and-harry-cheapening-royals

He talks to the press in exchange for money, he publishes private letters - why on earth would she want to have anything to do with him?

He doesn’t sound pissed - what are you talking about? He sounds like an older man who isn’t used to speaking to a camera to me.

It’s very unusual for an entire family to turn against one person within it - especially when the one person doesn’t appear to have many people from her past prepared to speak positively about her. Perhaps there’s a single factor in all of this.

Nga all the time - doesn’t everyone??

Nezumi65

why do you hate Thomas Markle......at least he didn't come the the UK and take money off of us!

He only showed M's letter because she had already given her friends permission to do so.

So what if he was pissed...so what.
he is not money grabbing....he actually worked in a areal job...not the cushy type the RF usually call work.