grannydarkhair
Doodledog Is it not obvious? You’re non-binary! And your husband must be as well, from what you say about him. Congratulations to you both! 😂
Isn't everyone these days? Since the days when Janet and John lived with Mummy and Daddy, Mummy stayed at home, and Mrs Scrubbit helped her in the house with Janet chipping in at times, and Daddy went to work, whilst Sam helped him in the garden and John watched admiringly as Daddy did manly things like sawing logs. Mummy always wore a smart skirt and blouse, Mrs Scrubbit a pinny, Janet a dress, John long shorts and socks, Daddy a suit and tie, and Sam overalls. Everything was ordained by your age, sex and class in that world, which seems to be the one to which Some People would like to return, except with more glitter and lots of shouting. That was breaking down significantly until recently, when 'identification' came in. I wonder - if I decided to identify as rich, would that mean I would be allowed into first class waiting rooms and VIP areas?
I expect he'll just get over it.
Maybe. Or he could 'sharpen his pencil' and explain what his experience has been*, which will, of course risk having his views dismissed with a swipe, as ours have been. What is it about your newly acquired views that makes them so right that you can just write off those who don't agree with you? (newsflash - not everyone is going to do so)
*Obviously there is no obligation for anyone to explain their lives, but as I keep saying, there are constant demands for fact-based feminists to explain their thought processes and to defend themselves against entirely unfounded (not to say cliched and tedious) allegations of racism and homophobia, with nothing coming back in the other direction, even out of courtesy.
Just magnanimously granting permission for us to 'argue all we like' - not about the meaning of words, but about the basis of a new law - is not remotely the same as engaging in a discussion and giving an alternative point of view. What was your feeling about your friend's situation whilst you were still on the fence? Presumably there was some opinion on the matter then that at least mitigated what you now feel since the act went through?
The fact-based arguments are many and varied, and are repeated on here over and over - to the point where they are getting tedious to write. In reply, if we get one at all, is 'just because', anecdotes about individuals, whose experience are, to goes without saying, valid, but are not necessarily representative of anything else, or arrogant dismissal. Is it any wonder none of us seems likely to change our minds?